{"title":"Book Review: Spin Dictators: The Changing Face of Tyranny in the 21st Century by Sergei Guriev and Daniel Treisman","authors":"Rodney Tiffen","doi":"10.1177/19401612221132643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1976, I was living in Singapore doing a research project on Western foreign correspondents in Southeast Asia. One of my interviewees was James Fu, who deftly combined the roles of Lee Kwan Yew’s press secretary with being news director at the Singapore Broadcasting Corporation. He spent mornings in the Prime Minister’s office and afternoons at the TV studio. He was an early embodiment of the theme of this book Spin Dictators. Guriev and Treisman argue that over the last generation the earlier “fear dictators” who intimidated their citizens through violence and sought total control have been increasingly supplanted by dictators using more sophisticated control measures. Their examples include Singapore’s pioneering Lee, Russia’s Putin, Peru’s Fujimori, Venezuela’s Chavez, Malaysia’s Mahathir Mohamed and his successors, Hungary’s Orban, and Turkey’s Erdogan. The rich array of examples under these and other rulers are complemented by quantitative data on different regime types, including for example numbers of political prisoners and political killings. The move from fear to spin dictators is very much a result of—and in turn a driver of —what they call “the modernisation cocktail.” It reflects the changing political dynamics in a postindustrial society. Whereas fear dictators aim to intimidate their citizens and often publicly parade their violence in suppressing dissent; spin dictators aim to encourage affection and respect. They are more likely to conceal or camouflage any violence. Rather than instilling fear, they place a higher priority on projecting their competence, and ability to advance the country. Whereas fear dictators sought total and obvious censorship spin dictators aim for “sensible censorship,” with a much lighter, less publicly visible touch and more sophisticated means of surveillance. Many have moved from censoring the media to coopting them, seeking celebrity endorsements, or staging international sporting events. Book Review","PeriodicalId":47605,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Press-Politics","volume":"28 1","pages":"323 - 325"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Press-Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221132643","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In 1976, I was living in Singapore doing a research project on Western foreign correspondents in Southeast Asia. One of my interviewees was James Fu, who deftly combined the roles of Lee Kwan Yew’s press secretary with being news director at the Singapore Broadcasting Corporation. He spent mornings in the Prime Minister’s office and afternoons at the TV studio. He was an early embodiment of the theme of this book Spin Dictators. Guriev and Treisman argue that over the last generation the earlier “fear dictators” who intimidated their citizens through violence and sought total control have been increasingly supplanted by dictators using more sophisticated control measures. Their examples include Singapore’s pioneering Lee, Russia’s Putin, Peru’s Fujimori, Venezuela’s Chavez, Malaysia’s Mahathir Mohamed and his successors, Hungary’s Orban, and Turkey’s Erdogan. The rich array of examples under these and other rulers are complemented by quantitative data on different regime types, including for example numbers of political prisoners and political killings. The move from fear to spin dictators is very much a result of—and in turn a driver of —what they call “the modernisation cocktail.” It reflects the changing political dynamics in a postindustrial society. Whereas fear dictators aim to intimidate their citizens and often publicly parade their violence in suppressing dissent; spin dictators aim to encourage affection and respect. They are more likely to conceal or camouflage any violence. Rather than instilling fear, they place a higher priority on projecting their competence, and ability to advance the country. Whereas fear dictators sought total and obvious censorship spin dictators aim for “sensible censorship,” with a much lighter, less publicly visible touch and more sophisticated means of surveillance. Many have moved from censoring the media to coopting them, seeking celebrity endorsements, or staging international sporting events. Book Review
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Press/Politics is an interdisciplinary journal for the analysis and discussion of the role of the press and politics in a globalized world. The Journal is interested in theoretical and empirical research on the linkages between the news media and political processes and actors. Special attention is given to the following subjects: the press and political institutions (e.g. the state, government, political parties, social movements, unions, interest groups, business), the politics of media coverage of social and cultural issues (e.g. race, language, health, environment, gender, nationhood, migration, labor), the dynamics and effects of political communication.