7 - Understanding Shifts in Nigeria’s Trade Policy: From Realism to Protectionism

Folarin Alayande
{"title":"7 - Understanding Shifts in Nigeria’s Trade Policy: From Realism to Protectionism","authors":"Folarin Alayande","doi":"10.57054/ad.v45i1.656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nThe reluctance of Nigeria, Africa’s largest economy, to sign two major international trade liberalisation agreements in 2018 shocked many local and international observers. However, these trade policy postures were not unexpected. Undiscerned by many analysts, many subtle changes had happened to Nigeria’s international co-operation architecture and foreign economic policy in a seemingly incoherent manner. In addition, the premise for expecting Nigeria to automatically consent to both agreements was faulty for two main reasons. First, the pretext of connectivity and market access as the underlying rationale for both agreements was allegedly hinged on the fallacy of composition, with the assumption that the whole was greater than the sum of its parts. This pretext was increasingly questioned by the influential, organised private sector in Nigeria, which had shifted from the altruistic foreign policy tenets of the 1970s to insulation from negative externalities of trade. Second, Nigeria’s trade posture was erroneously considered separately from its foreign economic policy posture, which was increasingly hinged on beneficial concentricism and regaining internal capabilities. In this new dispensation, with a focus on strategic trade policy underpinned by economic pragmatism, understanding shifts in the domestic balance of power is critical to predicting Nigeria’s trade policy responses. \n \n \n \n \n \n \nFolarin Alayande, Department of Economics and Development Studies, Covenant University, Nigeria Email: falayande@yahoo.com \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":39851,"journal":{"name":"Africa Development/Afrique et Developpement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa Development/Afrique et Developpement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57054/ad.v45i1.656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The reluctance of Nigeria, Africa’s largest economy, to sign two major international trade liberalisation agreements in 2018 shocked many local and international observers. However, these trade policy postures were not unexpected. Undiscerned by many analysts, many subtle changes had happened to Nigeria’s international co-operation architecture and foreign economic policy in a seemingly incoherent manner. In addition, the premise for expecting Nigeria to automatically consent to both agreements was faulty for two main reasons. First, the pretext of connectivity and market access as the underlying rationale for both agreements was allegedly hinged on the fallacy of composition, with the assumption that the whole was greater than the sum of its parts. This pretext was increasingly questioned by the influential, organised private sector in Nigeria, which had shifted from the altruistic foreign policy tenets of the 1970s to insulation from negative externalities of trade. Second, Nigeria’s trade posture was erroneously considered separately from its foreign economic policy posture, which was increasingly hinged on beneficial concentricism and regaining internal capabilities. In this new dispensation, with a focus on strategic trade policy underpinned by economic pragmatism, understanding shifts in the domestic balance of power is critical to predicting Nigeria’s trade policy responses. Folarin Alayande, Department of Economics and Development Studies, Covenant University, Nigeria Email: falayande@yahoo.com
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解尼日利亚贸易政策的转变:从现实主义到保护主义
2018年,非洲最大经济体尼日利亚不愿签署两项重要的国际贸易自由化协定,令许多当地和国际观察人士感到震惊。然而,这些贸易政策姿态并不出人意料。许多分析人士没有察觉到,尼日利亚的国际合作架构和对外经济政策发生了许多看似不连贯的微妙变化。此外,期望尼日利亚自动同意这两项协议的前提是错误的,主要有两个原因。第一,以连通性和市场准入作为这两项协定的基本理由的借口,据称是建立在构成谬误的基础上的,即假定整体大于各部分的总和。这一借口越来越受到尼日利亚有影响力、有组织的私营部门的质疑,这些私营部门已经从20世纪70年代的利他主义外交政策信条转变为与贸易的负面外部性隔绝。其次,尼日利亚的贸易姿态被错误地与其对外经济政策姿态分开考虑,后者越来越依赖于有利的集中和恢复内部能力。在这种以经济实用主义为基础的战略贸易政策的新形势下,了解国内权力平衡的变化对于预测尼日利亚的贸易政策反应至关重要。Folarin Alayande,尼日利亚圣约大学经济与发展研究系,电子邮件:falayande@yahoo.com
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Africa Development/Afrique et Developpement
Africa Development/Afrique et Developpement Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Africa Development (ISSN 0850 3907) is the quarterly bilingual journal of CODESRIA published since 1976. It is a social science journal whose major focus is on issues which are central to the development of society. Its principal objective is to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas among African scholars from a variety of intellectual persuasions and various disciplines. The journal also encourages other contributors working on Africa or those undertaking comparative analysis of developing world issues. Africa Development welcomes contributions which cut across disciplinary boundaries. Articles with a narrow focus and incomprehensible to people outside their discipline are unlikely to be accepted.
期刊最新文献
Effets de la Covid-19 sur les entreprises du secteur informel agricole au Sénégal Prelim Editorial Governance Issues and the Covid-19 Pandemic in West Africa: Are There Any Linkages? Digital Learning Response in the Midst of the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Case of Mauritius
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1