Echoes and Shadows: A Phenomenological Reconsideration of Plato's Cave Allegory

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY Phenomenology & Practice Pub Date : 2019-05-31 DOI:10.29173/PANDPR29372
Edvin Østergaard
{"title":"Echoes and Shadows: A Phenomenological Reconsideration of Plato's Cave Allegory","authors":"Edvin Østergaard","doi":"10.29173/PANDPR29372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the cave allegory, Plato illustrates his theory of ideas by showing that the world man senses and tries to understand, actually only is a dim representation of the real world. We know the allegory for its light and shadow; however, there is also sound and echo in the cave. In this article, I discuss whether the narrative of the prisoners in the cave is in tune with an audial experience and whether an allegory led by sound corresponds to the one led by sight. I start with a phenomenological analysis of the cave as a place of sound. After that, I elaborate on the training of attentive listening skills and its ramifications for pedagogical practice. I conclude that there are profound differences between seeing and listening and that sound reveals different aspects of “the real” compared to sight. The significance of Plato’s cave allegory should be evaluated in relation to modern, scientific thought characterised by a visual-spatial language. With support of this allegory, the light-shadow polarity has become the Urbild of represented reality. At the same time, a visually oriented culture of ideas repeatedly confirms Plato’s cave allegory as its central metaphor. Finally, an elaboration on the sounds in the cave proves to be fruitful in an educational sense: The comparison of sound and sight sharpens the differences and complementarities of audial and visual experiences.","PeriodicalId":43858,"journal":{"name":"Phenomenology & Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.29173/PANDPR29372","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phenomenology & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/PANDPR29372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In the cave allegory, Plato illustrates his theory of ideas by showing that the world man senses and tries to understand, actually only is a dim representation of the real world. We know the allegory for its light and shadow; however, there is also sound and echo in the cave. In this article, I discuss whether the narrative of the prisoners in the cave is in tune with an audial experience and whether an allegory led by sound corresponds to the one led by sight. I start with a phenomenological analysis of the cave as a place of sound. After that, I elaborate on the training of attentive listening skills and its ramifications for pedagogical practice. I conclude that there are profound differences between seeing and listening and that sound reveals different aspects of “the real” compared to sight. The significance of Plato’s cave allegory should be evaluated in relation to modern, scientific thought characterised by a visual-spatial language. With support of this allegory, the light-shadow polarity has become the Urbild of represented reality. At the same time, a visually oriented culture of ideas repeatedly confirms Plato’s cave allegory as its central metaphor. Finally, an elaboration on the sounds in the cave proves to be fruitful in an educational sense: The comparison of sound and sight sharpens the differences and complementarities of audial and visual experiences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回声与阴影:柏拉图洞穴寓言的现象学反思
在洞穴寓言中,柏拉图通过展示人类感知和试图理解的世界实际上只是真实世界的模糊代表来说明他的思想理论。我们知道寓言的光与影;然而,洞穴里也有声音和回声。在这篇文章中,我讨论了洞穴中囚犯的叙述是否与听觉体验一致,以及以声音为主导的寓言是否与以视觉为主导的寓言相对应。我从现象学分析洞穴作为声音的地方开始。之后,我详细阐述了专注听力技能的训练及其对教学实践的影响。我的结论是,视觉和听觉之间存在着深刻的差异,与视觉相比,声音揭示了“真实”的不同方面。柏拉图洞穴寓言的意义应该与以视觉空间语言为特征的现代科学思想联系起来评价。在这个寓言的支持下,光影的极性已经成为表征现实的Urbild。与此同时,一种视觉导向的思想文化一再证实柏拉图的洞穴寓言是其核心隐喻。最后,对洞穴中声音的阐述在教育意义上是富有成效的:声音和视觉的比较使听觉和视觉体验的差异和互补性更加明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hermeneutics in an Age of Alternative Facts, Fake News, and Climate Change Denial Attunement as a Pedagogical Starting Point Experiential Intensity of Exploring Place Abandoned Pre-Service Teachers in the Outdoors: A Phenomenological Exploration Language-ing the Earth: Experiential Renewal for a Relationally Sensitive Environmentalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1