Book Review: The Great American Workforce: A Student’s Guide to Work and the Economy by Garrison Moore and Robert Bowman

Q2 Arts and Humanities Labor Studies Journal Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1177/0160449X211039136
Alicia Massie
{"title":"Book Review: The Great American Workforce: A Student’s Guide to Work and the Economy by Garrison Moore and Robert Bowman","authors":"Alicia Massie","doi":"10.1177/0160449X211039136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"insurance schemes typically administered by governments. Finally, the United States could reinstate workers’ boards to negotiate matters such as minimum wages. This was the system in place in the first decade of the Fair Labor Standards Act, before it was diluted in 1947 by the Portal-to-Portal Act amendments pushed by Republican legislators. Without a doubt, the political right and many business leaders will aggressively challenge Madland’s proposals. Madland recognizes that politics matter. He argues that for his plan to be viable, U.S. voters will need to support pro-labor policies, even those who vote Republican. While he thinks there is a chance this could happen, it is difficult to believe that under our present polarized political landscape such coming together has any chance of success—except, perhaps in some cities and states with large majorities of Democratic voters. That said, one should not give up the fight before it starts. Engaging with the ideas of Madland’s book is important for today’s labor movement, progressives, and everyone else thinking about bold and different institutions that can revitalize labor and rebalance the influence of money and power in all aspects of our country.","PeriodicalId":35267,"journal":{"name":"Labor Studies Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449X211039136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

insurance schemes typically administered by governments. Finally, the United States could reinstate workers’ boards to negotiate matters such as minimum wages. This was the system in place in the first decade of the Fair Labor Standards Act, before it was diluted in 1947 by the Portal-to-Portal Act amendments pushed by Republican legislators. Without a doubt, the political right and many business leaders will aggressively challenge Madland’s proposals. Madland recognizes that politics matter. He argues that for his plan to be viable, U.S. voters will need to support pro-labor policies, even those who vote Republican. While he thinks there is a chance this could happen, it is difficult to believe that under our present polarized political landscape such coming together has any chance of success—except, perhaps in some cities and states with large majorities of Democratic voters. That said, one should not give up the fight before it starts. Engaging with the ideas of Madland’s book is important for today’s labor movement, progressives, and everyone else thinking about bold and different institutions that can revitalize labor and rebalance the influence of money and power in all aspects of our country.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Garrison Moore和Robert Bowman的书评:《伟大的美国劳动力:工作与经济学生指南》
保险计划通常由政府管理。最后,美国可以恢复工人委员会,就最低工资等问题进行谈判。这是《公平劳动标准法》(Fair Labor Standards Act)第一个十年实施的制度,直到1947年被共和党议员推动的《门户对门户法案》(Portal-to-Portal Act)修正案削弱。毫无疑问,政治右翼和许多商界领袖将积极挑战马德兰的提议。马德兰认识到政治很重要。他认为,要使他的计划可行,美国选民需要支持亲劳工政策,即使是那些投票给共和党的选民。虽然他认为这有可能发生,但很难相信在我们目前两极分化的政治格局下,这样的联合有任何成功的机会——也许在一些民主党选民占多数的城市和州除外。也就是说,人们不应该在战斗开始之前就放弃。对今天的劳工运动、进步人士和其他思考大胆而不同的制度的人来说,参与马德兰的书中的观点是很重要的,这些制度可以振兴劳动力,并重新平衡金钱和权力在我们国家各个方面的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Labor Studies Journal
Labor Studies Journal Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Labor Studies Journal is the official journal of the United Association for Labor Education and is a multi-disciplinary journal publishing research on work, workers, labor organizations, and labor studies and worker education in the US and internationally. The Journal is interested in manuscripts using a diversity of research methods, both qualitative and quantitative, directed at a general audience including union, university, and community based labor educators, labor activists and scholars from across the social sciences and humanities. As a multi-disciplinary journal, manuscripts should be directed at a general audience, and care should be taken to make methods, especially highly quantitative ones, accessible to a general reader.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing the Benefits and Limitations of Non-Degree Credentials: The Case of Apprenticeship in Oregon The Potential and Limits of Spontaneous Labor Activism on Social Media: The Search for Justice among Chinese Restaurant Workers Book Review: The Hammer: Power, Inequality, and the Struggle for the Soul of Labor by Nolan, Hamilton Book Review: Our Veterans: Winners, Losers, Friends and Enemies on the New Terrain of Veterans Affairs by Gordon, Suzanne, Steve Early and Jasper Craven Opening the Ballot Box: Examining the Union Voting Behavior of Scholarship Football Players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1