Quarantines: Between Precaution and Necessity. A Look at COVID-19

IF 1.4 3区哲学 Q2 ETHICS Public Health Ethics Pub Date : 2021-01-25 DOI:10.1093/phe/phaa037

V. Raposo

引用次数: 9

Abstract

Abstract The events surrounding COVID-19, combined with the mandatory quarantines widely imposed in Asia and Europe since the virus outbreak, have reignited discussion of the balance between individual rights and liberties and public health during epidemics and pandemics. This article analyses this issue from the perspectives of precaution and necessity. There is a difficult relationship between these two seemingly opposite principles, both of which are frequently invoked in this domain. Although the precautionary principle (PP) encourages the use of quarantines, including mandatory quarantines, and associated restrictive measures, the principle of necessity (PN) puts a break on such measures. The COVID-19 pandemic reveals once again the different interrelations between these two principles. However, the alleged conflict between the PN and the PP is based on a superficial analysis. The relation between these two principles is far more complex, as this article will demonstrate.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

隔离:在预防和必要之间。透视COVID-19

围绕COVID-19的事件，加上自病毒爆发以来在亚洲和欧洲广泛实施的强制隔离，重新引发了关于流行病和大流行期间个人权利和自由与公共卫生之间平衡的讨论。本文从预防和必要性两个角度对这一问题进行了分析。这两个看似相反的原则之间存在一种困难的关系，这两个原则在这个领域中都经常被调用。虽然预防性原则(PP)鼓励使用隔离措施，包括强制隔离和相关的限制性措施，但必要性原则(PN)则禁止此类措施。2019冠状病毒病大流行再次揭示了这两个原则之间不同的相互关系。然而，所谓的PN和PP之间的冲突是基于一个肤浅的分析。正如本文将演示的那样，这两个原则之间的关系要复杂得多。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Public Health Ethics PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-MEDICAL ETHICS

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

9.50%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Public Health Ethics invites submission of papers on any topic that is relevant for ethical reflection about public health practice and theory. Our aim is to publish readable papers of high scientific quality which will stimulate debate and discussion about ethical issues relating to all aspects of public health. Our main criteria for grading manuscripts include originality and potential impact, quality of philosophical analysis, and relevance to debates in public health ethics and practice. Manuscripts are accepted for publication on the understanding that they have been submitted solely to Public Health Ethics and that they have not been previously published either in whole or in part. Authors may not submit papers that are under consideration for publication elsewhere, and, if an author decides to offer a submitted paper to another journal, the paper must be withdrawn from Public Health Ethics before the new submission is made. The editorial office will make every effort to deal with submissions to the journal as quickly as possible. All papers will be acknowledged on receipt by email and will receive preliminary editorial review within 2 weeks. Papers of high interest will be sent out for external review. Authors will normally be notified of acceptance, rejection, or need for revision within 8 weeks of submission. Contributors will be provided with electronic access to their proof via email; corrections should be returned within 48 hours.