Comparison of Estrogen Receptor Status and K i -67 Index in Core Needle Biopsy and Resected Specimen of Breast Carcinoma

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU Pub Date : 2023-04-14 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1762580
Geoffrey Sundar E., K. Hl, J. K., C. Rao, A. K.
{"title":"Comparison of Estrogen Receptor Status and K i -67 Index in Core Needle Biopsy and Resected Specimen of Breast Carcinoma","authors":"Geoffrey Sundar E., K. Hl, J. K., C. Rao, A. K.","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1762580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background and Objectives  The status of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and K i -67 expression in core needle biopsy and excision specimens has concurrent results, but many show discordance. However, only a few studies on the subject are available in India. Therefore, this study aims to compare the ER and K i -67 expression status in core needle biopsy and excision specimens of breast carcinoma. Materials and Methods  In this cross-sectional analytical study, 50 breast carcinoma cases were histopathologically examined for ER and K i -67 expression in both core needle biopsy and excision specimen. The interpreter was blinded for the evaluation of ER and K i -67 expression index and the data obtained were analyzed using SPSS version 27. Results  The average age of the participants was 50 years and breast lump was the most common presenting complaint in all the cases. The concordance rate of histological typing between core needle biopsy and excision specimens was 96%, and the majority were invasive ductal carcinoma (60%) and not otherwise specified (48%) having Nottingham histologic grade 3 (46%). The concordance rate between core needle biopsy and excision specimen for ER and K i -67 expression was 86% ( n  = 43) and 54% ( n  = 27), respectively. Most of the cases were found to be luminal A type (38%). Additionally, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ER between core needle biopsy and excision specimen were 78.79, 100, 100, and 70.83%, respectively; however, these were 44, 64, 55, and 53.33%, respectively, for K i -67. Conclusion  Although the concordance of the ER status between core needle biopsy and excision specimen was substantial, the discordance rate of K i -67 was found to be high. Hence, relying solely on core needle biopsy for critical decision-making is inadvisable; however, core needle biopsy can be used as an initial procedure to examine histology and receptor status, Therefore, it is better to reconsider performing immunohistochemistry for the excision specimen, more importantly in ER-negative cases, to benefit the patient with targeted therapy.","PeriodicalId":40092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU","volume":"13 1","pages":"575 - 580"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1762580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives  The status of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and K i -67 expression in core needle biopsy and excision specimens has concurrent results, but many show discordance. However, only a few studies on the subject are available in India. Therefore, this study aims to compare the ER and K i -67 expression status in core needle biopsy and excision specimens of breast carcinoma. Materials and Methods  In this cross-sectional analytical study, 50 breast carcinoma cases were histopathologically examined for ER and K i -67 expression in both core needle biopsy and excision specimen. The interpreter was blinded for the evaluation of ER and K i -67 expression index and the data obtained were analyzed using SPSS version 27. Results  The average age of the participants was 50 years and breast lump was the most common presenting complaint in all the cases. The concordance rate of histological typing between core needle biopsy and excision specimens was 96%, and the majority were invasive ductal carcinoma (60%) and not otherwise specified (48%) having Nottingham histologic grade 3 (46%). The concordance rate between core needle biopsy and excision specimen for ER and K i -67 expression was 86% ( n  = 43) and 54% ( n  = 27), respectively. Most of the cases were found to be luminal A type (38%). Additionally, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ER between core needle biopsy and excision specimen were 78.79, 100, 100, and 70.83%, respectively; however, these were 44, 64, 55, and 53.33%, respectively, for K i -67. Conclusion  Although the concordance of the ER status between core needle biopsy and excision specimen was substantial, the discordance rate of K i -67 was found to be high. Hence, relying solely on core needle biopsy for critical decision-making is inadvisable; however, core needle biopsy can be used as an initial procedure to examine histology and receptor status, Therefore, it is better to reconsider performing immunohistochemistry for the excision specimen, more importantly in ER-negative cases, to benefit the patient with targeted therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌核心针活检和切除标本中雌激素受体状态和KI-67指数的比较
摘要背景和目标 在核心针活检和切除标本中,雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)和KI-67的表达状况有共同的结果,但许多结果不一致。然而,印度只有少数关于这一主题的研究。因此,本研究旨在比较ER和KI-67在乳腺癌核心针活检和切除标本中的表达状况。材料和方法 在这项横断面分析研究中,对50例乳腺癌进行了组织病理学检查,在核心针活检和切除标本中ER和KI-67的表达。口译员对ER和KI-67表达指数进行盲法评估,并使用SPSS 27版对获得的数据进行分析。后果 参与者的平均年龄为50岁,乳腺肿块是所有病例中最常见的主诉。核心针活检和切除标本的组织学分型一致率为96%,大多数为浸润性导管癌(60%),诺丁汉组织学等级为3级(46%),未另行说明(48%)。核心针活检和切除标本ER和KI-67表达的一致性为86%(n = 43)和54%(n = 27)。大多数病例为管腔A型(38%)。此外,核心针活检和切除标本之间ER的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为78.79%、100%、100%和70.83%;然而,对于KI-67,这一比例分别为44%、64%、55%和53.33%。结论 尽管核心针活检和切除标本的ER状态基本一致,但发现KI-67的不一致率很高。因此,仅仅依靠核心针活检进行关键决策是不可取的;然而,核心针活检可作为检查组织学和受体状态的初始程序。因此,最好重新考虑对切除标本进行免疫组织化学检查,更重要的是在ER阴性病例中,以使患者受益于靶向治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU
Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
85
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Postnatal Depression in Fathers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Kurdish Version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH-KU) Scale Gardner's Syndrome—A Case Report and Brief Literature Effect of Arm Ability Training on Functional Mobility and Dexterity in Hemiparetic Subjects Hepatocellular Carcinoma Presenting as Extension of Tumor Thrombus into the Right Atrium from the Portal Vein through Inferior Vena Cava Treated with Chemoembolization: A Rare Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1