{"title":"Investigational Therapies and Patients’ Autonomy","authors":"Trisevgeni Papakonstantinou, T. Kolettis","doi":"10.7202/1073786ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing demand for novel therapies has raised new ethical dilemmas for society. Vigorous debates have been initiated, especially after the recent Right to Try Act in the US, which aims to facilitate access to new agents, even at an early stage of the investigation process. This article explores the concept of patient’s autonomy in accessing investigational treatments, and discusses the implications of autonomy for patients, researchers and regulatory authorities. We propose that, in cases of adequate understanding of the anticipated risks and benefits, society should accept patients’ autonomy in choosing to try new therapies, even in the absence of firm data. However, basic ethical principles should not be compromised, as the medical community and society as a whole retain the right to properly evaluate the accumulated experience from such cases. These thoughts may contribute to the ongoing discussions on ethical policies in clinical research.","PeriodicalId":37334,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1073786ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The growing demand for novel therapies has raised new ethical dilemmas for society. Vigorous debates have been initiated, especially after the recent Right to Try Act in the US, which aims to facilitate access to new agents, even at an early stage of the investigation process. This article explores the concept of patient’s autonomy in accessing investigational treatments, and discusses the implications of autonomy for patients, researchers and regulatory authorities. We propose that, in cases of adequate understanding of the anticipated risks and benefits, society should accept patients’ autonomy in choosing to try new therapies, even in the absence of firm data. However, basic ethical principles should not be compromised, as the medical community and society as a whole retain the right to properly evaluate the accumulated experience from such cases. These thoughts may contribute to the ongoing discussions on ethical policies in clinical research.
对新疗法日益增长的需求给社会带来了新的伦理困境。激烈的辩论已经开始,尤其是在美国最近通过了《审判权法案》(Right to Try Act)之后,该法案旨在促进接触新的特工,即使是在调查过程的早期阶段。本文探讨了患者在获得研究性治疗方面的自主概念,并讨论了自主对患者、研究人员和监管机构的影响。我们建议,在充分了解预期风险和收益的情况下,社会应该接受患者在选择尝试新疗法时的自主权,即使在缺乏可靠数据的情况下。然而,基本的伦理原则不应受到损害,因为医学界和整个社会都有权正确评价从这些案例中积累的经验。这些想法可能有助于正在进行的关于临床研究伦理政策的讨论。