{"title":"Does Brainstorming Promote Cohesiveness? How the Rules of Brainstorming Mirror Symbolic Convergence","authors":"D. Henningsen, M. Henningsen","doi":"10.1080/08934215.2017.1394476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brainstorming is a technique to promote idea generation that may also promote cohesiveness in idea generating groups. Similarities between the rules of brainstorming and the logic of fantasy chaining from symbolic convergence theory are considered. In 41 groups, 151 participants reported their perceptions of freewheeling (i.e., willingness to share impractical ideas), piggybacking (i.e., building on the ideas of others), focusing on quantity (i.e., prioritizing as many ideas as possible), and nonevaluation (i.e., not providing feedback to the ideas of others) and their perceptions of group cohesiveness. Cohesiveness is significantly predicted by increased perceptions of piggybacking and focusing on quantity. Counter to predictions, freewheeling is not positively associated with cohesiveness.","PeriodicalId":45913,"journal":{"name":"Communication Reports","volume":"31 1","pages":"103 - 114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08934215.2017.1394476","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2017.1394476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Brainstorming is a technique to promote idea generation that may also promote cohesiveness in idea generating groups. Similarities between the rules of brainstorming and the logic of fantasy chaining from symbolic convergence theory are considered. In 41 groups, 151 participants reported their perceptions of freewheeling (i.e., willingness to share impractical ideas), piggybacking (i.e., building on the ideas of others), focusing on quantity (i.e., prioritizing as many ideas as possible), and nonevaluation (i.e., not providing feedback to the ideas of others) and their perceptions of group cohesiveness. Cohesiveness is significantly predicted by increased perceptions of piggybacking and focusing on quantity. Counter to predictions, freewheeling is not positively associated with cohesiveness.
期刊介绍:
Communication Reports (CR), published biannually since 1988, is one of two scholarly journals of the Western States Communication Association (WSCA). The journal publishes original manuscripts that are short, data/text-based, and related to the broadly defined field of human communication. The mission of the journal is to showcase exemplary scholarship without censorship based on topics, methods, or analytical tools. Articles that are purely speculative or theoretical, and not data analytic, are not appropriate for this journal. Authors are expected to devote a substantial portion of the manuscript to analyzing and reporting research data.