Impacts of U.S. countervailing duties on phosphate fertilizers

IF 4.2 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY American Journal of Agricultural Economics Pub Date : 2023-04-26 DOI:10.1111/ajae.12401
Ashley Beeler, K. Aleks Schaefer, Jacob Sestak, Glenn Conover
{"title":"Impacts of U.S. countervailing duties on phosphate fertilizers","authors":"Ashley Beeler,&nbsp;K. Aleks Schaefer,&nbsp;Jacob Sestak,&nbsp;Glenn Conover","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Countervailing duties are a trade policy instrument by which importing governments tax imports that are found to benefit from foreign subsidies. Thus, in effect, these duties attempt to remedy market distortions generated by foreign subsidies by further distorting market mechanisms. On March 11, 2021, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued duties ranging between 19.97% and 47.05% on Moroccan phosphate imports upon finding that Moroccan exports had been receiving unfair government subsidies. In this research, we estimate the impacts of these duties on U.S. diammonium phosphate and triple superphosphate fertilizers, as well as long-run downstream prices of five U.S. row crops with the largest phosphate usage. Using these results, we assess the implications for gross receipts in the U.S. fertilizer industry and gross margins for American farmers. We also calculate the implied change in expenditure for agricultural end users. We find that the countervailing duties have increased U.S. phosphate fertilizer prices by approximately 34% over counterfactual levels. This corresponds to an expected downstream price response ranging from around 10% for corn, cotton, and sorghum to between 1% and 4% for soybeans and wheat. This market distortion generates a $23 billion increase in gross receipts for a concentrated domestic fertilizer industry while shrinking gross margins for American farmers by 2% and 8% and increasing agricultural user expenditures by approximately $10.84 billion.</p>","PeriodicalId":55537,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"106 2","pages":"620-636"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajae.12401","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Countervailing duties are a trade policy instrument by which importing governments tax imports that are found to benefit from foreign subsidies. Thus, in effect, these duties attempt to remedy market distortions generated by foreign subsidies by further distorting market mechanisms. On March 11, 2021, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued duties ranging between 19.97% and 47.05% on Moroccan phosphate imports upon finding that Moroccan exports had been receiving unfair government subsidies. In this research, we estimate the impacts of these duties on U.S. diammonium phosphate and triple superphosphate fertilizers, as well as long-run downstream prices of five U.S. row crops with the largest phosphate usage. Using these results, we assess the implications for gross receipts in the U.S. fertilizer industry and gross margins for American farmers. We also calculate the implied change in expenditure for agricultural end users. We find that the countervailing duties have increased U.S. phosphate fertilizer prices by approximately 34% over counterfactual levels. This corresponds to an expected downstream price response ranging from around 10% for corn, cotton, and sorghum to between 1% and 4% for soybeans and wheat. This market distortion generates a $23 billion increase in gross receipts for a concentrated domestic fertilizer industry while shrinking gross margins for American farmers by 2% and 8% and increasing agricultural user expenditures by approximately $10.84 billion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国反补贴税对磷肥的影响
反补贴税是一种贸易政策工具,进口国政府据此对受益于外国补贴的进口产品征税。因此,实际上,这些关税试图通过进一步扭曲市场机制来弥补外国补贴造成的市场扭曲。2021 年 3 月 11 日,美国国际贸易委员会发现摩洛哥出口的磷酸盐产品接受了不公平的政府补贴,因此对摩洛哥进口磷酸盐产品征收 19.97% 至 47.05% 的关税。在本研究中,我们估算了这些关税对美国磷酸二铵和三过磷酸钙化肥的影响,以及磷酸盐用量最大的五种美国大田作物的长期下游价格。利用这些结果,我们评估了对美国化肥行业总收入和美国农民毛利率的影响。我们还计算了农业终端用户支出的隐含变化。我们发现,反补贴税使美国磷肥价格比反事实水平上涨了约 34%。这相当于预期的下游价格反应,玉米、棉花和高粱约为 10%,大豆和小麦在 1%到 4%之间。这种市场扭曲为集中的国内化肥行业带来了 230 亿美元的总收入增长,同时使美国农民的毛利率缩减了 2% 到 8%,农业用户支出增加了约 108.4 亿美元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
American Journal of Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Agricultural Economics provides a forum for creative and scholarly work on the economics of agriculture and food, natural resources and the environment, and rural and community development throughout the world. Papers should relate to one of these areas, should have a problem orientation, and should demonstrate originality and innovation in analysis, methods, or application. Analyses of problems pertinent to research, extension, and teaching are equally encouraged, as is interdisciplinary research with a significant economic component. Review articles that offer a comprehensive and insightful survey of a relevant subject, consistent with the scope of the Journal as discussed above, will also be considered. All articles published, regardless of their nature, will be held to the same set of scholarly standards.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Who (actually) gets the farm? Intergenerational farm succession in the United States Issue Information Integration of the US cannabis market Behavioral preferences and contract choice in the residential solar PV market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1