The Work Interevention Network (WIN): Foundations of a Holistic Vocational Intervention

IF 2.8 2区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Journal of Career Assessment Pub Date : 2022-11-04 DOI:10.1177/10690727221138619

Kelsey L. Autin, B. Allan, David L. Blustein, S. Kozan, Ofer Sharone, Brian J. Stevenson, R. G. Cinamon, J. Ferreira, Mindi N. Thompson

{"title":"The Work Interevention Network (WIN): Foundations of a Holistic Vocational Intervention","authors":"Kelsey L. Autin, B. Allan, David L. Blustein, S. Kozan, Ofer Sharone, Brian J. Stevenson, R. G. Cinamon, J. Ferreira, Mindi N. Thompson","doi":"10.1177/10690727221138619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the current study was to examine whether the key constructs targeted in the Work Intervention Network (WIN) intervention uniquely predicted well-being outcomes and mediated relations between un/underemployment and these outcomes. Using data from a sample of 462 adults in the U.S., we positioned employment status as a predictor of life satisfaction, well-being, and psychological distress. We also tested four mediators of these relations that operationalized targets in the WIN intervention – career engagement, social support, self-care, and self-blame. Employment status indirectly predicted life satisfaction, life meaning, and psychological distress via self-care and self-blame. Career engagement mediated the relation between employment status and psychological distress but in an unexpected direction. Social support was not directly predicted by employment status but predicted life satisfaction and life meaning. Results provided initial support for the WIN intervention and corroborate the contention that employment status is an important predictor of well-being.","PeriodicalId":47978,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Career Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Career Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727221138619","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to examine whether the key constructs targeted in the Work Intervention Network (WIN) intervention uniquely predicted well-being outcomes and mediated relations between un/underemployment and these outcomes. Using data from a sample of 462 adults in the U.S., we positioned employment status as a predictor of life satisfaction, well-being, and psychological distress. We also tested four mediators of these relations that operationalized targets in the WIN intervention – career engagement, social support, self-care, and self-blame. Employment status indirectly predicted life satisfaction, life meaning, and psychological distress via self-care and self-blame. Career engagement mediated the relation between employment status and psychological distress but in an unexpected direction. Social support was not directly predicted by employment status but predicted life satisfaction and life meaning. Results provided initial support for the WIN intervention and corroborate the contention that employment status is an important predictor of well-being.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

工作干预网络:全面职业干预的基础

本研究的目的是检验工作干预网络（WIN）干预中的关键结构是否能够唯一预测幸福感结果，以及失业/就业不足与这些结果之间的中介关系。利用美国462名成年人的样本数据，我们将就业状况定位为生活满意度、幸福感和心理困扰的预测因素。我们还测试了这些关系的四个中介，它们在WIN干预中实现了目标——职业参与、社会支持、自我照顾和自责。就业状况通过自我照顾和自责间接预测生活满意度、生活意义和心理痛苦。职业参与介导了就业状况与心理困扰之间的关系，但方向出乎意料。社会支持不是通过就业状况直接预测的，而是通过预测生活满意度和生活意义。研究结果为WIN干预提供了初步支持，并证实了就业状况是幸福感的重要预测因素的论点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Career Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

6.10

自引率

15.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Career Assessment publishes methodologically sound, empirically based studies focusing on the process and techniques by which counselors and others gain understanding of the individual faced with the necessity of making informed career decisions. The term career assessment, as used in this journal, covers the various techniques, tests, inventories, rating scales, interview schedules, surveys, and direct observational methods used in scientifically based practice and research to provide an improved understanding of career decision-making. The focus is not just testing, but all those means developed and used to assess and evaluate individuals and environments in the field of career counseling and development.