Second language word processing in sentence contexts: pre-lexical prediction versus post-lexical integration

E. Qurbi
{"title":"Second language word processing in sentence contexts: pre-lexical prediction versus post-lexical integration","authors":"E. Qurbi","doi":"10.29038/eejpl.2023.10.1.qur","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nThis study investigated the effects of sentence contexts on the second language (L2) word recognition process. It aims at finding whether second language (L2) learners of English perform similar to English native speakers in terms of using the sentence context to predict upcoming word in their L2. A group of L2 participants and a control group of native speakers (L1) participants performed a cross-modal priming task in which they were asked to make a lexical decision on a visually presented word while listening to a semantically related or non- related English sentence. The test was conducted to determine whether both groups of participants were able to predict an upcoming word based on the context of the preceding sentence that is auditorily presented. The study is conducted using PsychoPy software whereas the data was analyzed using linear-mixed effects modeling in RStudio software. The results showed that the L1 speakers were able to predict an upcoming word based on the context of the preceding sentence. That is, a significantly faster recognition of the related word was observed compared to the less related words. On other hand, the English second language participants were not as able to predict an upcoming word as quickly as the English native speaker participants were. However, the L2 participants showed post-access lexical processing or what is called an integrating process of the presented word to the previous sentence context. That is, an effect of the sentence context was observed with L2 participants, yet only after reading the presented word, they decide whether it is appropriate to the preceding sentence context or not.\nAcknowledgments\n\n\n\n\nThe author is thankful to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Najran University for funding this work under the National Research Priorities funding program.\n","PeriodicalId":36553,"journal":{"name":"East European Journal of Psycholinguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Journal of Psycholinguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2023.10.1.qur","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of sentence contexts on the second language (L2) word recognition process. It aims at finding whether second language (L2) learners of English perform similar to English native speakers in terms of using the sentence context to predict upcoming word in their L2. A group of L2 participants and a control group of native speakers (L1) participants performed a cross-modal priming task in which they were asked to make a lexical decision on a visually presented word while listening to a semantically related or non- related English sentence. The test was conducted to determine whether both groups of participants were able to predict an upcoming word based on the context of the preceding sentence that is auditorily presented. The study is conducted using PsychoPy software whereas the data was analyzed using linear-mixed effects modeling in RStudio software. The results showed that the L1 speakers were able to predict an upcoming word based on the context of the preceding sentence. That is, a significantly faster recognition of the related word was observed compared to the less related words. On other hand, the English second language participants were not as able to predict an upcoming word as quickly as the English native speaker participants were. However, the L2 participants showed post-access lexical processing or what is called an integrating process of the presented word to the previous sentence context. That is, an effect of the sentence context was observed with L2 participants, yet only after reading the presented word, they decide whether it is appropriate to the preceding sentence context or not. Acknowledgments The author is thankful to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Najran University for funding this work under the National Research Priorities funding program.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
句子语境中的二语文字处理:词汇前预测与词汇后整合
本研究探讨了句子语境对第二语言词汇识别过程的影响。它旨在发现第二语言(L2)学习者在使用句子上下文预测第二语言中即将出现的单词方面是否与英语母语人士相似。一组第二语言参与者和一组母语(L1)参与者执行了一个跨模态启动任务,在这个任务中,他们被要求在听一个语义相关或不相关的英语句子时,对一个视觉呈现的单词做出词汇决定。这项测试是为了确定两组参与者是否能够根据前面的句子的上下文来预测即将出现的单词。本研究使用PsychoPy软件进行,而数据分析使用RStudio软件中的线性混合效果建模。结果显示,母语为第一语言的人能够根据前一句的上下文预测即将到来的单词。也就是说,与不相关的单词相比,对相关单词的识别速度要快得多。另一方面,英语为第二语言的参与者预测即将出现的单词的速度不如英语为母语的参与者快。然而,第二语言参与者表现出访问后的词汇加工,即所谓的将所呈现的单词整合到前一个句子上下文的过程。也就是说,第二语言参与者观察到句子语境的影响,但只有在阅读了所呈现的单词后,他们才决定它是否适合前一个句子语境。作者感谢Najran大学的科学研究主任在国家研究优先资助计划下为这项工作提供资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
East European Journal of Psycholinguistics
East European Journal of Psycholinguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Axiological dimension of citizenship and patriotism in a worldview of Kazakhs: A psycholinguistic study The Language of the Weather Forecast in Italian and Spanish Television Broadcasts: Linguistic-Descriptive Analysis of the End of Winter on RTVE and TG5 Television Channels Psycholinguistic and cognitive-semiotic dimensions of constructing fear in horror films: A multimodal perspective Linguistic and semiotic representation of pessimism in The Happy Prince and Other Tales by Oscar Wilde On the Impact of Mode of Presentation and Age on Parsing Structurally Ambiguous Relative Clauses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1