Perception of Comfort, Fit, and Jumping Performance of Elite NCAA Division 1 Student-athletes: The Effect of Basketball Shoe Design – Part II

Tony Luczak, Reuben F. Burch, Brian K. Smith, J. Lamberth, Daniel W. Carruth, Collin Crane, Marci Hoppa, Bill Burgos
{"title":"Perception of Comfort, Fit, and Jumping Performance of Elite NCAA Division 1 Student-athletes: The Effect of Basketball Shoe Design – Part II","authors":"Tony Luczak, Reuben F. Burch, Brian K. Smith, J. Lamberth, Daniel W. Carruth, Collin Crane, Marci Hoppa, Bill Burgos","doi":"10.7575/aiac.ijkss.v.8n.3p.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Assessing basketball shoe comfort and fit as personal protection equipment (PPE) at the collegiate level is unique. Objective: The purpose of Part II in this pilot study was to examine the effect of shoe design on the perception of comfort and fit after performing an acute series of jumps in elite male and female National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division 1 basketball student-athletes. Method: A total of sixteen basketball student-athletes (six males, ten females) performed two rounds of acute series of four styled basketball jumps on two ForceDecksTM Force Platforms while trying to maximize jump height by tapping VertecTM Jump Vanes. The male student-athletes selected the AdidasTM Harden Vol. 3 and the AdidasTM SM Pro basketball shoes. The female student-athletes selected the Adidas Harden Vol. 3 and the Adidas Captain Marvel basketball shoes. Upon completion of each round of jumps, the student-athlete recorded their perception of comfort on a 110mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and fit on a seven-point Likert rating scale based against their most comfortable basketball shoes ever worn. Results: Results of this pilot study reported, on average, the male student-athletes preferred comfort and fit of the Adidas SM Pro basketball shoes and the female student-athletes preferred the Adidas Harden Vol. 3 basketball shoe, though differences were non-significant at p > 0.05. Conclusion: The use of a human factors assessment tool to evaluate basketball shoe comfort and fit and the influence of rated comfort and fit parameters on basketball jumping performance proved viable.","PeriodicalId":36327,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijkss.v.8n.3p.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Assessing basketball shoe comfort and fit as personal protection equipment (PPE) at the collegiate level is unique. Objective: The purpose of Part II in this pilot study was to examine the effect of shoe design on the perception of comfort and fit after performing an acute series of jumps in elite male and female National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division 1 basketball student-athletes. Method: A total of sixteen basketball student-athletes (six males, ten females) performed two rounds of acute series of four styled basketball jumps on two ForceDecksTM Force Platforms while trying to maximize jump height by tapping VertecTM Jump Vanes. The male student-athletes selected the AdidasTM Harden Vol. 3 and the AdidasTM SM Pro basketball shoes. The female student-athletes selected the Adidas Harden Vol. 3 and the Adidas Captain Marvel basketball shoes. Upon completion of each round of jumps, the student-athlete recorded their perception of comfort on a 110mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and fit on a seven-point Likert rating scale based against their most comfortable basketball shoes ever worn. Results: Results of this pilot study reported, on average, the male student-athletes preferred comfort and fit of the Adidas SM Pro basketball shoes and the female student-athletes preferred the Adidas Harden Vol. 3 basketball shoe, though differences were non-significant at p > 0.05. Conclusion: The use of a human factors assessment tool to evaluate basketball shoe comfort and fit and the influence of rated comfort and fit parameters on basketball jumping performance proved viable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NCAA优秀1级学生运动员的舒适感知、适宜度和跳跃表现:篮球鞋设计的影响-第二部分
背景:在大学水平评估篮球鞋作为个人防护装备(PPE)的舒适性和适宜性是独特的。目的:本研究的第二部分旨在探讨球鞋设计对全国大学体育协会(NCAA)优秀男女篮球学生运动员在进行一系列急性跳跃后舒适性和合脚感的影响。方法:共16名篮球学生运动员(男6名,女10名)在两个ForceDecksTM力平台上进行两轮四种风格的急性系列篮球跳跃,同时尝试通过点击VertecTM跳跃叶片最大限度地提高跳跃高度。男学生运动员选择AdidasTM Harden Vol. 3和AdidasTM SM Pro篮球鞋。女学生运动员选择了Adidas Harden Vol. 3和Adidas Captain Marvel篮球鞋。在完成每一轮跳跃后,学生运动员在110毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)上记录他们对舒适度的感知,并根据他们所穿过的最舒适的篮球鞋进行7分李克特评分。结果:本先导研究结果显示,男学生运动员平均偏好阿迪达斯SM Pro篮球鞋的舒适性和合脚性,女学生运动员平均偏好阿迪达斯Harden Vol. 3篮球鞋,但差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:采用人因评价工具评价篮球鞋的舒适度和合度,以及不同舒适度和合度参数对篮球跳跳性能的影响是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science
International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Multiple Hop Test Kinematics Between Force-Platforms and Video Footage – A Cross Sectional Study Home-Based Pilates Exercise Regimen Can Alter the Balance and Trunk Mobility of Non-Exercising Middle-Aged Women: A Pilot Study A Potential Screening Tool for Nutritional Preparedness in Collegiate Level Female Athletes: A Pilot study Impact of Stretching Exercises on Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review Front Crawl and Backstroke Sprint Swimming have Distinct Differences along with Similar Patterns Regarding Trunk Rotations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1