An Ethics of Recognition: Redressing the Good and the Right

Sebastian Purcell
{"title":"An Ethics of Recognition: Redressing the Good and the Right","authors":"Sebastian Purcell","doi":"10.5195/jffp.2019.881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Oneself as Another , Paul Ricoeur proposes a new ethical theory that integrates Aristotle’s eudaemonist virtue ethical outlook with Immanuel Kant’s deontological ethics. The goal is ambitious, and recent discussions in anglophone philosophy have made its undertaking look to be founded on a confusion. The new argument goes that the ethical justification at work in the Aristotelian and Kantian traditions is of opposed kinds. Attempts to integrate them, as a result, are either incoherent, or, in the best case, simply minor variations on one or another predominant ethical outlook. The essay grants the opposed kinds thesis and argues that despite its apparent impossibility, Ricoeur nevertheless does succeed in integrating two ethical approaches, including their different sources of justification, to produce a novel and thus ethically interesting theory. The essay closes, finally, with a reflection on how this method might be developed one step further to include an insight by Emmanuel Levinas on the look of the Other, and so make for an ethics of recognition.","PeriodicalId":41846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy","volume":"27 1","pages":"142-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/jffp.2019.881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Oneself as Another , Paul Ricoeur proposes a new ethical theory that integrates Aristotle’s eudaemonist virtue ethical outlook with Immanuel Kant’s deontological ethics. The goal is ambitious, and recent discussions in anglophone philosophy have made its undertaking look to be founded on a confusion. The new argument goes that the ethical justification at work in the Aristotelian and Kantian traditions is of opposed kinds. Attempts to integrate them, as a result, are either incoherent, or, in the best case, simply minor variations on one or another predominant ethical outlook. The essay grants the opposed kinds thesis and argues that despite its apparent impossibility, Ricoeur nevertheless does succeed in integrating two ethical approaches, including their different sources of justification, to produce a novel and thus ethically interesting theory. The essay closes, finally, with a reflection on how this method might be developed one step further to include an insight by Emmanuel Levinas on the look of the Other, and so make for an ethics of recognition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
承认的伦理:重塑善与权
Paul Ricoeur在《作为他人的自我》一书中提出了一种新的伦理理论,将亚里士多德的道德伦理观与康德的道德伦理相结合。这个目标是雄心勃勃的,最近英语哲学的讨论使它的事业看起来是建立在混乱的基础上的。新的论点认为,亚里士多德和康德传统中的伦理论证是对立的。因此,整合它们的尝试要么是不连贯的,要么在最好的情况下,只是对一种或另一种主流道德观的微小变化。这篇文章支持了相反类型的论点,并认为尽管这显然是不可能的,但Ricoeur确实成功地将两种伦理方法,包括它们不同的理由来源,结合在一起,产生了一种新颖的、因此在伦理上有趣的理论。最后,这篇文章以反思如何进一步发展这种方法,以纳入埃马纽埃尔·莱维纳斯对他者外观的见解,从而形成一种认可的伦理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Work of Staying-With Into the Looking Glass: The Mirror of Old Age in Beauvoir and Améry Loving with bell, Leaping with Fanon, and Landing Nowhere Epidermalization of Inferiority: A Fanonian Reading of Marie Vieux-Chauvet’s Amour ‘A definite quantity of all the differences in the world’: Glissant, Spinoza, and the Abyss as True Cause
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1