Risk factors of self-extubation in intensive care. Retrospective cohort study

Carlos Eduardo Laverde-Sabogal, Carmelo José Espinosa-Almanza, D. Patiño-Hernández, Horacio Rodríguez-Escallón, Juan Camilo Aguado-Valderrama, P. Lara-Monsalve
{"title":"Risk factors of self-extubation in intensive care. Retrospective cohort study","authors":"Carlos Eduardo Laverde-Sabogal, Carmelo José Espinosa-Almanza, D. Patiño-Hernández, Horacio Rodríguez-Escallón, Juan Camilo Aguado-Valderrama, P. Lara-Monsalve","doi":"10.5554/22562087.e1050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Acute respiratory failure remains one of the three leading causes of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Self-extubation is an adverse outcome requiring reintubation in 50% of cases. \nObjective: To assess for determinants (risk factors) of self-extubation and mortality in the ICU by using a generalized estimation equation model (GEE). \nMethods: The data was collected from a retrospective cohort study from 2017-2020 including all patients admitted to the ICU with mechanical ventilation. Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed. Then, a GEE model was conducted to predict the risk of self-extubation and mortality. \nResults: A total of 857 subjects were included, with a mean age of 60.5 +/- 17 years-old. Most of the subjects were males (55.2%). An 8.99-fold risk (95%CI 3.83-21.1, p<0.01) of self-extubation was identified in patients with agitation. Exposure to infusion of neuromuscular blockade was also found to increase the risk of self-extubation 3.37 times (95%CI 1.31-8.68, p=0.01). No associations were identified between immobilization and self-extubation (OR 1.38 95%CI 0.76-2.51, p=0.29). Finally, light sedation according to the Richmond Sedation Scale (RASS) between 0 to -2 rather than moderate (RASS-3) reduces the risk of mortality (OR 0.57, 95%CI 0.38-0.83, p<0.01). \nConclusions: The main factors resulting in self-extubation were: agitation, delirium, and infusion of neuromuscular blocking agents. An association was found between light sedation and a lower risk of mortality. No association was found between the use of physical restraint and the desired outcome.","PeriodicalId":36529,"journal":{"name":"Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5554/22562087.e1050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acute respiratory failure remains one of the three leading causes of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Self-extubation is an adverse outcome requiring reintubation in 50% of cases. Objective: To assess for determinants (risk factors) of self-extubation and mortality in the ICU by using a generalized estimation equation model (GEE). Methods: The data was collected from a retrospective cohort study from 2017-2020 including all patients admitted to the ICU with mechanical ventilation. Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed. Then, a GEE model was conducted to predict the risk of self-extubation and mortality. Results: A total of 857 subjects were included, with a mean age of 60.5 +/- 17 years-old. Most of the subjects were males (55.2%). An 8.99-fold risk (95%CI 3.83-21.1, p<0.01) of self-extubation was identified in patients with agitation. Exposure to infusion of neuromuscular blockade was also found to increase the risk of self-extubation 3.37 times (95%CI 1.31-8.68, p=0.01). No associations were identified between immobilization and self-extubation (OR 1.38 95%CI 0.76-2.51, p=0.29). Finally, light sedation according to the Richmond Sedation Scale (RASS) between 0 to -2 rather than moderate (RASS-3) reduces the risk of mortality (OR 0.57, 95%CI 0.38-0.83, p<0.01). Conclusions: The main factors resulting in self-extubation were: agitation, delirium, and infusion of neuromuscular blocking agents. An association was found between light sedation and a lower risk of mortality. No association was found between the use of physical restraint and the desired outcome.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护中自我拔管的危险因素。回顾性队列研究
引言:急性呼吸衰竭仍然是入住重症监护室(ICU)的三大主要原因之一。在50%的病例中,自我拔管是需要再次插管的不良结果。目的:应用广义估计方程模型(GEE)评估ICU中自我拔管和死亡率的决定因素(危险因素)。方法:数据收集自2017-2020年的一项回顾性队列研究,包括所有入住ICU并接受机械通气的患者。进行了单变量和双变量分析。然后,进行GEE模型来预测自我拔管的风险和死亡率。结果:共纳入857名受试者,平均年龄为60.5+/-17岁。大多数受试者是男性(55.2%)。在躁动的患者中,自我拔管的风险是8.99倍(95%CI 3.83-21.1,p<0.01)。暴露于输注神经肌肉阻滞剂也会使自拔管的风险增加3.37倍(95%CI 1.31-8.68,p=0.01)。固定和自拔管之间没有关联(OR 1.38,95%CI 0.76-2.51,p=0.29)。最后,根据里士满镇静量表(RASS),0至-2而非中度(RAS-3)的轻度镇静可降低死亡率(OR 0.57,95%CI 0.38-0.83,p<0.01)。结论:导致自我拔管的主要因素是:激动、谵妄和输注神经肌肉阻滞剂。研究发现轻度镇静与较低的死亡率之间存在关联。未发现使用身体约束与预期结果之间存在关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology
Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The environmental responsibility of modern anesthesiology and perioperative care Características del paro cardiaco extrahospitalario atendido por operadores de ambulancias en Medellín. Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de base poblacional Shortage of perioperative supplies and drugs: Theory and practical implications Respuesta hemodinámica a dosis subanestésicas de ketamina en dolor posoperatorio: revisión sistemática ChatGPT's learning and reasoning capacity in anesthesiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1