Creating a family centre by categorising clients in a steering group meeting interaction

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK Qualitative Social Work Pub Date : 2022-12-23 DOI:10.1177/14733250221147027
J. Räsänen, Suvi Raitakari, Kirsi Juhila
{"title":"Creating a family centre by categorising clients in a steering group meeting interaction","authors":"J. Räsänen, Suvi Raitakari, Kirsi Juhila","doi":"10.1177/14733250221147027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies the creation of organisations via people processing (Prottas 1979), taking as its case study a new and developing family centre that aims to offer various social and health services under the same roof. The study draws on ethnomethodology, meaning that organisations are herein understood as being created and continuously produced in and through interaction. The data consist of 11 audio-recorded meetings from the centre’s steering group, which includes managers from different service fields and welfare agencies. In analysing the creation of the centre through people processing, this paper scrutinises how the meeting participants orient themselves toward and produce the centre’s client categories, what characteristics they connect to these categories, and how they do boundary work regarding which categories belong or not to the centre’s target groups. The meeting participants produce three different family based client categories. The first category is ordinary families, those without any special problems who just pop into the centre to see other people. These families are distinguished from the second category, best matching families, who are defined as having problems that would benefit from the integrated, multi-professional work conducted at the centre. The third category, families with too specific needs, refers to client groups whose service needs are at least partly beyond the centre’s expertise and resources. The centre needs these people-processing activities to make sense of its mission, clients and co-partners; this ongoing reasoning process allows the emerging centre to exist and find its place in the local service system.","PeriodicalId":47677,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Social Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250221147027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper studies the creation of organisations via people processing (Prottas 1979), taking as its case study a new and developing family centre that aims to offer various social and health services under the same roof. The study draws on ethnomethodology, meaning that organisations are herein understood as being created and continuously produced in and through interaction. The data consist of 11 audio-recorded meetings from the centre’s steering group, which includes managers from different service fields and welfare agencies. In analysing the creation of the centre through people processing, this paper scrutinises how the meeting participants orient themselves toward and produce the centre’s client categories, what characteristics they connect to these categories, and how they do boundary work regarding which categories belong or not to the centre’s target groups. The meeting participants produce three different family based client categories. The first category is ordinary families, those without any special problems who just pop into the centre to see other people. These families are distinguished from the second category, best matching families, who are defined as having problems that would benefit from the integrated, multi-professional work conducted at the centre. The third category, families with too specific needs, refers to client groups whose service needs are at least partly beyond the centre’s expertise and resources. The centre needs these people-processing activities to make sense of its mission, clients and co-partners; this ongoing reasoning process allows the emerging centre to exist and find its place in the local service system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过在指导小组会议互动中对客户进行分类,创建一个家庭中心
本文研究了通过人员处理创建组织的问题(Prottas 1979),以一个新的发展中的家庭中心为案例研究,该中心旨在在同一屋檐下提供各种社会和健康服务。该研究借鉴了民族方法论,这意味着组织在本文中被理解为是在互动中创建和持续产生的。数据包括该中心指导小组的11次录音会议,其中包括来自不同服务领域和福利机构的管理人员。在通过人员处理分析中心的创建过程中,本文仔细研究了会议参与者如何定位和产生中心的客户类别,他们与这些类别有什么联系,以及他们如何就哪些类别属于或不属于中心的目标群体进行边界工作。会议参与者产生了三种不同的基于家庭的客户类别。第一类是普通家庭,那些没有任何特殊问题的家庭,他们只是突然来到中心看望其他人。这些家庭与第二类最佳匹配家庭不同,后者被定义为有问题,可以从该中心进行的综合、多专业的工作中受益。第三类,需求过于具体的家庭,是指其服务需求至少部分超出中心专业知识和资源范围的客户群体。该中心需要这些人处理活动,以理解其使命、客户和合作伙伴;这种不断进行的推理过程使新兴中心得以存在,并在当地服务系统中找到自己的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Qualitative Social Work provides a forum for those interested in qualitative research and evaluation and in qualitative approaches to practice. The journal facilitates interactive dialogue and integration between those interested in qualitative research and methodology and those involved in the world of practice. It reflects the fact that these worlds are increasingly international and interdisciplinary in nature. The journal is a forum for rigorous dialogue that promotes qualitatively informed professional practice and inquiry.
期刊最新文献
Toward a creative and imaginative research approach: Collage as a method of inquiry in social work Arts-based research with immigrant and racialized older adults: A scoping review. Book review: Time In this issue… How conversations can empower and involve: Building the evidence for Approved Mental Health Professionals’ communicative practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1