The construction and analysis of dream metaphors from the standpoint of Co-Creative Dream Theory

G. Sparrow
{"title":"The construction and analysis of dream metaphors from the standpoint of Co-Creative Dream Theory","authors":"G. Sparrow","doi":"10.11588/IJODR.2020.1.69293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Co-creative dream theory posits that the dream is co-determined through the reciprocal interplay between the witnessing dream ego and the emergent content. Consequently, the resulting dream can be seen as one of many contingent outcomes based on the dreamer’s range of response through the course of the dream, as well as the broad constraints of underlying domains that account for the nature and thrust of the emergent content. From this relational view of the dream, the visual imagery is not the content itself, but rather the “mutable interface” (Sparrow, 2013) between the dream ego and the emergent content. The purpose of this paper is to consider how the Co-creative Paradigm (CCP) builds on contributions by Jung (2014), Ullman (1969), Lakoff (1993), Lakoff & Johnson (1980), and Rossi (1972), in particular, to construct a view of metaphor formation in dreams. By viewing dream content as representing broad domains of human experience rendered as specific metaphoric imagery during the dream encounter itself, this approach can discern where the dream ego stands in relationship to the developmental tasks associated with these emergent domains. Finally, I will introduce a generic approach to co-creative dreamwork that includes several operations that may facilitate effective dreamwork practice. The hypothesis presented in this paper is that this novel view of metaphoric imagery construction, based on the Co-Creative Paradigm, opens up new questions, and fosters insights heretofore unavailable from the standpoint of traditional content-oriented dream analysis.","PeriodicalId":38642,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dream Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"90-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dream Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11588/IJODR.2020.1.69293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Co-creative dream theory posits that the dream is co-determined through the reciprocal interplay between the witnessing dream ego and the emergent content. Consequently, the resulting dream can be seen as one of many contingent outcomes based on the dreamer’s range of response through the course of the dream, as well as the broad constraints of underlying domains that account for the nature and thrust of the emergent content. From this relational view of the dream, the visual imagery is not the content itself, but rather the “mutable interface” (Sparrow, 2013) between the dream ego and the emergent content. The purpose of this paper is to consider how the Co-creative Paradigm (CCP) builds on contributions by Jung (2014), Ullman (1969), Lakoff (1993), Lakoff & Johnson (1980), and Rossi (1972), in particular, to construct a view of metaphor formation in dreams. By viewing dream content as representing broad domains of human experience rendered as specific metaphoric imagery during the dream encounter itself, this approach can discern where the dream ego stands in relationship to the developmental tasks associated with these emergent domains. Finally, I will introduce a generic approach to co-creative dreamwork that includes several operations that may facilitate effective dreamwork practice. The hypothesis presented in this paper is that this novel view of metaphoric imagery construction, based on the Co-Creative Paradigm, opens up new questions, and fosters insights heretofore unavailable from the standpoint of traditional content-oriented dream analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同创造梦理论视角下梦隐喻的建构与分析
共同创造梦理论认为,梦是通过见证梦的自我和涌现内容之间的相互作用共同决定的。因此,由此产生的梦可以被视为许多偶然结果之一,这些偶然结果基于做梦者在做梦过程中的反应范围,以及解释突发内容的性质和推力的潜在领域的广泛约束。从梦的这种关系观点来看,视觉意象不是内容本身,而是梦自我与涌现内容之间的“可变界面”(Sparrow, 2013)。本文的目的是考虑共同创造范式(CCP)是如何建立在Jung(2014)、Ullman(1969)、Lakoff(1993)、Lakoff & Johnson(1980)和Rossi(1972)的贡献基础上的,特别是如何构建梦中的隐喻形成观。通过将梦的内容看作是人类经历的广泛领域,在梦的遭遇过程中呈现为特定的隐喻意象,这种方法可以辨别梦的自我与与这些涌现领域相关的发展任务之间的关系。最后,我将介绍一种共同创造梦想的通用方法,其中包括几种可能促进有效梦想实践的操作。本文提出的假设是,这种基于共同创造范式的隐喻意象构建的新观点,开辟了新的问题,并促进了传统的以内容为导向的梦分析观点迄今无法获得的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Dream Research
International Journal of Dream Research Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Jacob's dream: Useful for, and enlightened by, current dream research Dream recall frequency and content in women Wish I could see you without closing my eyes: Thematic Analysis of dream content of grieved parents with the perspective of religious, cultural and psychological dimension Imagery Rehearsal Therapy for trauma-affected refugees – A case series Typical dreams of falling, being chased, and being paralyzed in Germany from 1956 to 2000
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1