Not the usual suspects: creating the conditions for and implementing co-production with marginalised young people in Glasgow

IF 2.9 4区 管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Public Policy and Administration Pub Date : 2022-11-21 DOI:10.1177/09520767221140439
J. Cullingworth, R. Brunner, Nicholas Watson
{"title":"Not the usual suspects: creating the conditions for and implementing co-production with marginalised young people in Glasgow","authors":"J. Cullingworth, R. Brunner, Nicholas Watson","doi":"10.1177/09520767221140439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Co-production is now an established part of public service delivery. Despite its popularity, there is only a limited understanding about how co-production works in practice, particularly with marginalised groups. This paper identifies and explores insights from three case studies of a successful co-productive approach in Glasgow, Scotland. Operation Modulus is a criminal justice initiative involving public and third sector partners in the co-production of services with marginalised young people to reduce their involvement in crime and antisocial behaviour. The data highlighted the importance of leadership, the role of public service professionals and the process of working with marginalised young people; these are explored, all within the context of the authorising environment created at the level of a collaborative governance body. The findings underscore, first, the importance of distributed leadership and process in developing trust amongst partners and in turn in the relationships of partners with young people. Second, the essential role of effective co-management amongst service providers in creating the requisite conditions for meaningful co-production with marginalised citizens. Third, the potential for and importance of shared management to facilitate changes in professional relationships and ways of working, even if these do not lead to organisational systems change. Fourth, the significance of public service professionals having the authority and agency to explore collaborative ways of working.","PeriodicalId":47076,"journal":{"name":"Public Policy and Administration","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Policy and Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767221140439","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Co-production is now an established part of public service delivery. Despite its popularity, there is only a limited understanding about how co-production works in practice, particularly with marginalised groups. This paper identifies and explores insights from three case studies of a successful co-productive approach in Glasgow, Scotland. Operation Modulus is a criminal justice initiative involving public and third sector partners in the co-production of services with marginalised young people to reduce their involvement in crime and antisocial behaviour. The data highlighted the importance of leadership, the role of public service professionals and the process of working with marginalised young people; these are explored, all within the context of the authorising environment created at the level of a collaborative governance body. The findings underscore, first, the importance of distributed leadership and process in developing trust amongst partners and in turn in the relationships of partners with young people. Second, the essential role of effective co-management amongst service providers in creating the requisite conditions for meaningful co-production with marginalised citizens. Third, the potential for and importance of shared management to facilitate changes in professional relationships and ways of working, even if these do not lead to organisational systems change. Fourth, the significance of public service professionals having the authority and agency to explore collaborative ways of working.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
而不是通常的怀疑:为格拉斯哥边缘化的年轻人创造条件并实施合作制作
合作制作现已成为提供公共服务的一个既定组成部分。尽管它很受欢迎,但人们对合拍片在实践中是如何运作的了解有限,尤其是与边缘化群体的合作。本文确定并探讨了苏格兰格拉斯哥成功的合作生产方法的三个案例研究的见解。模数行动是一项刑事司法倡议,涉及公共和第三部门合作伙伴与边缘化年轻人共同提供服务,以减少他们参与犯罪和反社会行为。数据强调了领导力的重要性、公共服务专业人员的作用以及与边缘化年轻人合作的过程;这些都在协作治理主体级别上创建的授权环境的上下文中进行了探索。研究结果强调,首先,分布式领导和流程在建立合作伙伴之间的信任以及合作伙伴与年轻人之间的关系中的重要性。其次,服务提供商之间有效的共同管理在为与边缘化公民有意义的共同生产创造必要条件方面发挥了重要作用。第三,共享管理在促进职业关系和工作方式变化方面的潜力和重要性,即使这些不会导致组织系统的变化。第四,公共服务专业人员具有探索协同工作方式的权威和代理权的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Policy and Administration
Public Policy and Administration PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Policy and Administration is the journal of the UK Joint University Council (JUC) Public Administration Committee (PAC). The journal aims to publish original peer-reviewed material within the broad field of public policy and administration. This includes recent developments in research, scholarship and practice within public policy, public administration, government, public management, administrative theory, administrative history, and administrative politics. The journal seeks to foster a pluralistic approach to the study of public policy and administration. International in readership, Public Policy and Administration welcomes submissions for anywhere in the world, from both academic and practitioner communities.
期刊最新文献
Promoting public sector innovation: who does what, when and how? Contours of a research programme for the study of the relationship of religion and public administration Artificial intelligence and public administration: Understanding actors, governance, and policy from micro, meso, and macro perspectives Sustainable urban development: A scoping review of barriers to the public policy and administration Theoretical-methodological aspects of researching the area of religion and public administration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1