Respect@Uni: A feminist insider perspective on respect-based culture change in higher education

IF 4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Critical Studies in Education Pub Date : 2022-11-06 DOI:10.1080/17508487.2022.2143837
R. Barnacle, D. Cuthbert, A. Hall, L. T. Sidelil
{"title":"Respect@Uni: A feminist insider perspective on respect-based culture change in higher education","authors":"R. Barnacle, D. Cuthbert, A. Hall, L. T. Sidelil","doi":"10.1080/17508487.2022.2143837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article provides feminist insider perspectives on the development and delivery of an innovative respect-based sexual assault and sexual harassment (SASH) prevention initiative in higher education. The initiative is designed specifically to address risk factors in graduate research. It is one of the first of its kind world-wide. Respect and cognate, moderate feminist, concepts are increasingly prevalent as oblique, or stealth, approaches to gender equality in contexts in which doing so openly may be counterproductive. The respect-based initiative examined here addresses the various risk factors that distinguish graduate research from undergraduate education, particularly power imbalances. Adopting a feminist reflective practice methodology, we provide an insider perspective into the multi-layered processes involved in enabling and undertaking institution-wide culture change of this kind. Our critical reflections focus on the stealth approaches adopted during design and delivery, highlighting resistance and receptivity to the initiative and how these were either countered or harnessed. The article provides both practical and theoretical insights into the advantages and limitations of respect-based culture-change. Most notably, it contributes to enhanced understanding of what works in practice, for which there is an urgent need.","PeriodicalId":47434,"journal":{"name":"Critical Studies in Education","volume":"64 1","pages":"318 - 336"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Studies in Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2022.2143837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article provides feminist insider perspectives on the development and delivery of an innovative respect-based sexual assault and sexual harassment (SASH) prevention initiative in higher education. The initiative is designed specifically to address risk factors in graduate research. It is one of the first of its kind world-wide. Respect and cognate, moderate feminist, concepts are increasingly prevalent as oblique, or stealth, approaches to gender equality in contexts in which doing so openly may be counterproductive. The respect-based initiative examined here addresses the various risk factors that distinguish graduate research from undergraduate education, particularly power imbalances. Adopting a feminist reflective practice methodology, we provide an insider perspective into the multi-layered processes involved in enabling and undertaking institution-wide culture change of this kind. Our critical reflections focus on the stealth approaches adopted during design and delivery, highlighting resistance and receptivity to the initiative and how these were either countered or harnessed. The article provides both practical and theoretical insights into the advantages and limitations of respect-based culture-change. Most notably, it contributes to enhanced understanding of what works in practice, for which there is an urgent need.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Respect@Uni:女性主义内部人士对高等教育中基于尊重的文化变革的看法
摘要本文提供了女权主义内部人士对高等教育中基于尊重的性侵犯和性骚扰预防倡议的发展和实施的看法。该倡议是专门针对研究生研究中的风险因素而设计的。这是世界上第一个此类项目。尊重和同源的、温和的女权主义者的概念越来越普遍,因为在公开这样做可能会适得其反的情况下,这是一种间接或隐蔽的性别平等方法。本文研究的基于尊重的举措解决了将研究生研究与本科生教育区分开来的各种风险因素,特别是权力失衡。采用女权主义反思性实践方法,我们为促成和实施这类机构范围的文化变革所涉及的多层次过程提供了一个内部视角。我们的批判性思考集中在设计和交付过程中采用的隐形方法上,强调了对该倡议的抵抗力和接受力,以及如何应对或利用这些方法。这篇文章对基于尊重的文化变革的优势和局限性提供了实践和理论上的见解。最值得注意的是,它有助于加深对实践中行之有效的东西的理解,而这正是迫切需要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Studies in Education
Critical Studies in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Critical Studies in Education is one of the few international journals devoted to a critical sociology of education, although it welcomes submissions with a critical stance that draw on other disciplines (e.g. philosophy, social geography, history) in order to understand ''the social''. Two interests frame the journal’s critical approach to research: (1) who benefits (and who does not) from current and historical social arrangements in education and, (2) from the standpoint of the least advantaged, what can be done about inequitable arrangements. Informed by this approach, articles published in the journal draw on post-structural, feminist, postcolonial and other critical orientations to critique education systems and to identify alternatives for education policy, practice and research.
期刊最新文献
Public education and teacher professionalism in an age of accountability Queer youth and critical sexuality education pedagogies within networked publics: implications for school-based practice Grappling with wicked problems: teacher professionalism and pedagogical mappings for reparative futures The role of online crisis actors in teachers’ work and lives Beyond conventional critique in education: embracing the affirmative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1