{"title":"Respect@Uni: A feminist insider perspective on respect-based culture change in higher education","authors":"R. Barnacle, D. Cuthbert, A. Hall, L. T. Sidelil","doi":"10.1080/17508487.2022.2143837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article provides feminist insider perspectives on the development and delivery of an innovative respect-based sexual assault and sexual harassment (SASH) prevention initiative in higher education. The initiative is designed specifically to address risk factors in graduate research. It is one of the first of its kind world-wide. Respect and cognate, moderate feminist, concepts are increasingly prevalent as oblique, or stealth, approaches to gender equality in contexts in which doing so openly may be counterproductive. The respect-based initiative examined here addresses the various risk factors that distinguish graduate research from undergraduate education, particularly power imbalances. Adopting a feminist reflective practice methodology, we provide an insider perspective into the multi-layered processes involved in enabling and undertaking institution-wide culture change of this kind. Our critical reflections focus on the stealth approaches adopted during design and delivery, highlighting resistance and receptivity to the initiative and how these were either countered or harnessed. The article provides both practical and theoretical insights into the advantages and limitations of respect-based culture-change. Most notably, it contributes to enhanced understanding of what works in practice, for which there is an urgent need.","PeriodicalId":47434,"journal":{"name":"Critical Studies in Education","volume":"64 1","pages":"318 - 336"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Studies in Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2022.2143837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT This article provides feminist insider perspectives on the development and delivery of an innovative respect-based sexual assault and sexual harassment (SASH) prevention initiative in higher education. The initiative is designed specifically to address risk factors in graduate research. It is one of the first of its kind world-wide. Respect and cognate, moderate feminist, concepts are increasingly prevalent as oblique, or stealth, approaches to gender equality in contexts in which doing so openly may be counterproductive. The respect-based initiative examined here addresses the various risk factors that distinguish graduate research from undergraduate education, particularly power imbalances. Adopting a feminist reflective practice methodology, we provide an insider perspective into the multi-layered processes involved in enabling and undertaking institution-wide culture change of this kind. Our critical reflections focus on the stealth approaches adopted during design and delivery, highlighting resistance and receptivity to the initiative and how these were either countered or harnessed. The article provides both practical and theoretical insights into the advantages and limitations of respect-based culture-change. Most notably, it contributes to enhanced understanding of what works in practice, for which there is an urgent need.
期刊介绍:
Critical Studies in Education is one of the few international journals devoted to a critical sociology of education, although it welcomes submissions with a critical stance that draw on other disciplines (e.g. philosophy, social geography, history) in order to understand ''the social''. Two interests frame the journal’s critical approach to research: (1) who benefits (and who does not) from current and historical social arrangements in education and, (2) from the standpoint of the least advantaged, what can be done about inequitable arrangements. Informed by this approach, articles published in the journal draw on post-structural, feminist, postcolonial and other critical orientations to critique education systems and to identify alternatives for education policy, practice and research.