Special Education Teacher Shortage: Differences Between High and Low Shortage States

IF 1.9 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teacher Education and Special Education Pub Date : 2020-03-07 DOI:10.1177/0888406420906618
David J. Peyton, Kelly Acosta, A. Harvey, Daisy J. Pua, P. Sindelar, Loretta Mason-Williams, Jim Dewey, Tiffany L. Fisher, E. Crews
{"title":"Special Education Teacher Shortage: Differences Between High and Low Shortage States","authors":"David J. Peyton, Kelly Acosta, A. Harvey, Daisy J. Pua, P. Sindelar, Loretta Mason-Williams, Jim Dewey, Tiffany L. Fisher, E. Crews","doi":"10.1177/0888406420906618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, using Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) personnel data from 2006 to 2014, we identified seven states with consistently low shortages of highly qualified special education teachers and seven states with persistently high shortages. We employed Guarino et al.’s framework to guide our assumptions and selection of demographic, supply, and demand variables and compared two groups in this descriptive analysis. We found significant differences across supply and demand variables. Low shortage states make greater investments in per pupil expenditures; have higher teacher salaries, generally; have greater preparation capacity; and produce more special education graduates. Taken together, our findings suggest that special education teaching is a relatively better job in low shortage states than in high shortage states. We situate the discussion of our findings within policy recommendations that states may use to address shortages. Limitations of our analysis are addressed, and implications for future research are proposed.","PeriodicalId":51596,"journal":{"name":"Teacher Education and Special Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"5 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0888406420906618","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teacher Education and Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406420906618","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

In this study, using Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) personnel data from 2006 to 2014, we identified seven states with consistently low shortages of highly qualified special education teachers and seven states with persistently high shortages. We employed Guarino et al.’s framework to guide our assumptions and selection of demographic, supply, and demand variables and compared two groups in this descriptive analysis. We found significant differences across supply and demand variables. Low shortage states make greater investments in per pupil expenditures; have higher teacher salaries, generally; have greater preparation capacity; and produce more special education graduates. Taken together, our findings suggest that special education teaching is a relatively better job in low shortage states than in high shortage states. We situate the discussion of our findings within policy recommendations that states may use to address shortages. Limitations of our analysis are addressed, and implications for future research are proposed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特殊教育教师短缺:高缺州与低缺州的差异
在这项研究中,利用特殊教育计划办公室(OSEP)2006年至2014年的人员数据,我们确定了七个州的高素质特殊教育教师短缺率一直很低,七个州短缺率一直居高不下。我们采用Guarino等人的框架来指导我们对人口、供应和需求变量的假设和选择,并在本描述性分析中比较了两组。我们发现供应和需求变量之间存在显著差异。短缺程度低的州加大了对每个学生支出的投资;一般来说,教师工资较高;有更大的准备能力;培养更多的特殊教育毕业生。总之,我们的研究结果表明,在低短缺州,特殊教育教学相对来说比在高短缺州更好。我们将对我们的调查结果的讨论置于各州可能用来解决短缺问题的政策建议中。讨论了我们分析的局限性,并提出了对未来研究的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teacher Education and Special Education
Teacher Education and Special Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.30%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Setting the Stage for a New Prologue Effects of Online Tiered Training to Increase Teachers’ Use of Positive Behavior Supports Supporting Paraeducators and their Use of Active Supervision at Recess: An Exploratory Study Assessing the Performance of Teachers of Students With Significant Disabilities: Establishing Content Validity for the TRAIT-SD Special Educators’ Training and Preparedness to Write Individualized Education Programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1