Agreement Between Alberta Infant Motor Scale Assessment and Maternal Perception of Motor Development in Full-Term Infants

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Developmental Neurorehabilitation Pub Date : 2022-03-20 DOI:10.1080/17518423.2022.2052373
Rosana Silva Dos Santos, Amanda Otília Oliveira de Lima Barreto, Maria Carolina Chapellem P Barbosa da Silva, Hugo Ormond Vianna Sá Nogueira, R. Peres, Márcia Gonçalves Ribeiro, H. C. Ferreira
{"title":"Agreement Between Alberta Infant Motor Scale Assessment and Maternal Perception of Motor Development in Full-Term Infants","authors":"Rosana Silva Dos Santos, Amanda Otília Oliveira de Lima Barreto, Maria Carolina Chapellem P Barbosa da Silva, Hugo Ormond Vianna Sá Nogueira, R. Peres, Márcia Gonçalves Ribeiro, H. C. Ferreira","doi":"10.1080/17518423.2022.2052373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objectives To verify the agreement between the Alberta Infant Motor Scale assessment and maternal perception of the motor development in full-term infants. Methods This is a cross-sectional study involving 161 infants and mothers. Children were assessed with the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) for motor developmental classification. Mothers completed questionnaires aiming to identify maternal profiles and impressions about their children’s development. The kappa test was used to analyze the concordance between AIMS and mother perceptions. Results A total of 83.2% of the sample was classified as typically developing and 16.8% as suspected or delayed development. The maternal impression indicates that 77% of infants are developing typically, 19.9% perceived their infants’ development as advanced, and 3.1% delayed development. There was low agreement between the mothers’ perceptions and AIMS classifications (kappa = 0.153) Conclusions Maternal perception of their infant’s development was unsatisfactory for evaluation of motor development because their perceptions did not agree with the findings of the AIMS.","PeriodicalId":51227,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Neurorehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Neurorehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2022.2052373","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives To verify the agreement between the Alberta Infant Motor Scale assessment and maternal perception of the motor development in full-term infants. Methods This is a cross-sectional study involving 161 infants and mothers. Children were assessed with the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) for motor developmental classification. Mothers completed questionnaires aiming to identify maternal profiles and impressions about their children’s development. The kappa test was used to analyze the concordance between AIMS and mother perceptions. Results A total of 83.2% of the sample was classified as typically developing and 16.8% as suspected or delayed development. The maternal impression indicates that 77% of infants are developing typically, 19.9% perceived their infants’ development as advanced, and 3.1% delayed development. There was low agreement between the mothers’ perceptions and AIMS classifications (kappa = 0.153) Conclusions Maternal perception of their infant’s development was unsatisfactory for evaluation of motor development because their perceptions did not agree with the findings of the AIMS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
艾伯塔省婴儿运动量表评估与足月婴儿运动发育知觉的一致性
摘要目的验证阿尔伯塔省婴儿运动量表评估和母亲对足月婴儿运动发育的认知之间的一致性。方法这是一项涉及161名婴儿和母亲的横断面研究。使用艾伯塔省婴儿运动量表(AIMS)对儿童进行运动发育分类评估。母亲们完成了问卷调查,旨在确定母亲对孩子发展的概况和印象。kappa检验用于分析AIMS和母亲认知之间的一致性。结果83.2%的样本被归类为典型发育,16.8%的样本被分类为疑似或延迟发育。母体印象表明,77%的婴儿发育正常,19.9%的婴儿认为婴儿发育迟缓,3.1%的婴儿发育迟缓。母亲的认知与AIMS分类之间的一致性较低(kappa=0.153)。结论母亲对婴儿发育的认知不符合运动发育的评估,因为她们的认知不与AIMS的结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Developmental Neurorehabilitation
Developmental Neurorehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Developmental Neurorehabilitation aims to enhance recovery, rehabilitation and education of people with brain injury, neurological disorders, and other developmental, physical and intellectual disabilities. Although there is an emphasis on childhood, developmental disability can be considered from a lifespan perspective. This perspective acknowledges that development occurs throughout a person’s life and thus a range of impairments or diseases can cause a disability that can affect development at any stage of life.
期刊最新文献
Utilizing an Environmental Framework to Explore the Acceptability of a Health Promotion Program for Youth with Disabilities Back geometry and mobility function changes in cerebral palsy children after backward walking training: arandomized controlled trial Reliability of the Clinical Measurement of Joint Motion and Muscle Length in the Upper and Lower Extremities of Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review Quantitative Analysis of Sexuality and Relationship Education in Inclusive Higher Education: Brief Report. Consequences of Virtual Reality Experience on Biomechanical Gait Parameters in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1