Economic Institutions in Ancient Greece and Mesoamerica

IF 0.3 Q4 SOCIAL ISSUES Social Evolution & History Pub Date : 2020-03-01 DOI:10.30884/seh/2020.01.02
Stephen A. Kowalewski
{"title":"Economic Institutions in Ancient Greece and Mesoamerica","authors":"Stephen A. Kowalewski","doi":"10.30884/seh/2020.01.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New studies have led to deeper comprehension of economic varia-tion and change in Late Post-classic Mesoamerica and the Archaic and Classical Greek world. Archaeological data on city-state set-tlement patterns, specialized production, trade, and household consumption, new archival material, and re-analysis of texts have un-dermined primitivism, substantivism, and ideal-types. In urbaniza-tion and demographic scale the two areas are comparable. Mesoamerican and Greek agricultural production was not simply for subsistence, but was market-oriented and market-dependent. Local and long-distance trade often functioned by market mechanisms. The economies had the capacity for real growth. There are two major differences. The Old World used state-issued coinage as money; Mesoamerica had goods monies. In the Old World the firm, or corporate group for carrying out economic activities, was sometimes larger than in Mesoamerica, where the household was the locus of specialized production. These differences had consequences in the relative capacity for accumulation, appropriation, and inequality.","PeriodicalId":42677,"journal":{"name":"Social Evolution & History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Evolution & History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30884/seh/2020.01.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

New studies have led to deeper comprehension of economic varia-tion and change in Late Post-classic Mesoamerica and the Archaic and Classical Greek world. Archaeological data on city-state set-tlement patterns, specialized production, trade, and household consumption, new archival material, and re-analysis of texts have un-dermined primitivism, substantivism, and ideal-types. In urbaniza-tion and demographic scale the two areas are comparable. Mesoamerican and Greek agricultural production was not simply for subsistence, but was market-oriented and market-dependent. Local and long-distance trade often functioned by market mechanisms. The economies had the capacity for real growth. There are two major differences. The Old World used state-issued coinage as money; Mesoamerica had goods monies. In the Old World the firm, or corporate group for carrying out economic activities, was sometimes larger than in Mesoamerica, where the household was the locus of specialized production. These differences had consequences in the relative capacity for accumulation, appropriation, and inequality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古希腊和中美洲的经济制度
新的研究使人们对后古典晚期中美洲和古代和古典希腊世界的经济变化和变化有了更深的理解。关于城邦定居模式、专业化生产、贸易和家庭消费的考古数据、新的档案材料和对文本的重新分析削弱了原始主义、实体主义和理想类型。在城市化和人口规模上,两地具有可比性。中美洲和希腊的农业生产不仅仅是为了维持生计,而是以市场为导向,依赖市场。地方和长途贸易往往由市场机制发挥作用。这些经济体有能力实现真正的增长。有两个主要区别。旧大陆使用国家发行的硬币作为货币;中美洲有商品货币。在旧大陆,进行经济活动的公司或公司集团有时比中美洲大,在中美洲,家庭是专门生产的场所。这些差异对积累、占有和不平等的相对能力产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Dois Tempos, Periférica Agenda Breve debate historiográfico sobre a evolução da filosofia da história: uma revisão de literatura Reforma agrária do Brasil e Peru da década de 60, sobre a ótica comparativa dos regimes militares The Rohingyas of Rakhine State: Social Evolution and History in the Light of Ethnic Nationalism Egypt: From Upper Egyptian Rural Petty Polities to Unitary State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1