How COVID-19 transformed the landscape of transportation research: an integrative scoping review and roadmap for future research

Milad Haghani , Rico Merkert , Ali Behnood , Chris De Gruyter , Khashayar Kazemzadeh , Hadi Ghaderi , Zahra Shahhoseini , Vinh Thai , Elnaz Irannezhad , Behnam Fahimnia , S Travis Waller , David A Hensher
{"title":"How COVID-19 transformed the landscape of transportation research: an integrative scoping review and roadmap for future research","authors":"Milad Haghani ,&nbsp;Rico Merkert ,&nbsp;Ali Behnood ,&nbsp;Chris De Gruyter ,&nbsp;Khashayar Kazemzadeh ,&nbsp;Hadi Ghaderi ,&nbsp;Zahra Shahhoseini ,&nbsp;Vinh Thai ,&nbsp;Elnaz Irannezhad ,&nbsp;Behnam Fahimnia ,&nbsp;S Travis Waller ,&nbsp;David A Hensher","doi":"10.1080/19427867.2022.2160294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, scholars mobilized their efforts to address its far-reaching societal problems. With mobility restrictions being front and center of the pandemic, a new cohort of transportation science was developed within a short period of time. Here, we examine more than 400 studies related to COVID-19 published across transportation journals during 2020 and 2021. The aim is (i) to scope this newly developed segment of transportation research, (ii) outline the diversity of pandemic-related issues across various divisions of the transportation field and (iii) provide a roadmap for the future of this line of research. Common themes are identified and existing congruence and discrepancies across findings are discussed. Results show that although conventional methods of transportation research were adopted in virtually all COVID-19 studies, no pre-pandemic study was particularly instrumental in the development of this segment of transportation literature. The COVID-19 segment appears to have developed its own independent knowledge foundation, in that, it does not systemically and frequently look back at any particular pre-pandemic reference. Potential impacts of this newly developed segment on the metrics of transportation journals are quantified and discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48974,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Letters-The International Journal of Transportation Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"Pages 43-88"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Letters-The International Journal of Transportation Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1942786723000462","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, scholars mobilized their efforts to address its far-reaching societal problems. With mobility restrictions being front and center of the pandemic, a new cohort of transportation science was developed within a short period of time. Here, we examine more than 400 studies related to COVID-19 published across transportation journals during 2020 and 2021. The aim is (i) to scope this newly developed segment of transportation research, (ii) outline the diversity of pandemic-related issues across various divisions of the transportation field and (iii) provide a roadmap for the future of this line of research. Common themes are identified and existing congruence and discrepancies across findings are discussed. Results show that although conventional methods of transportation research were adopted in virtually all COVID-19 studies, no pre-pandemic study was particularly instrumental in the development of this segment of transportation literature. The COVID-19 segment appears to have developed its own independent knowledge foundation, in that, it does not systemically and frequently look back at any particular pre-pandemic reference. Potential impacts of this newly developed segment on the metrics of transportation journals are quantified and discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎如何改变交通研究的格局:未来研究的综合范围审查和路线图
在 COVID-19 大流行之后,学者们动员起来,努力解决影响深远的社会问题。由于流动性限制是大流行病的前沿和中心问题,因此在短时间内形成了一批新的交通科学。在此,我们研究了 2020 年和 2021 年期间交通期刊上发表的 400 多篇与 COVID-19 相关的研究。我们的目的是:(i) 对这一新发展的交通研究领域进行梳理;(ii) 概述交通领域各部门与大流行病相关问题的多样性;(iii) 为这一研究领域的未来发展提供路线图。研究确定了共同的主题,并讨论了研究结果之间现有的一致性和差异性。研究结果表明,尽管几乎所有 COVID-19 研究都采用了传统的交通研究方法,但没有一项大流行前的研究对这部分交通文献的发展起到特别重要的作用。COVID-19 部分似乎已经形成了自己独立的知识基础,因为它并没有系统地、频繁地回顾大流行前的任何特定参考资料。我们对这一新发展的部分对交通期刊指标的潜在影响进行了量化和讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
79
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Transportation Letters: The International Journal of Transportation Research is a quarterly journal that publishes high-quality peer-reviewed and mini-review papers as well as technical notes and book reviews on the state-of-the-art in transportation research. The focus of Transportation Letters is on analytical and empirical findings, methodological papers, and theoretical and conceptual insights across all areas of research. Review resource papers that merge descriptions of the state-of-the-art with innovative and new methodological, theoretical, and conceptual insights spanning all areas of transportation research are invited and of particular interest.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the travel behavioral differences for the elderly mobility on public transit Exploring hierarchy shift of travelers’ public transport dependence using an improved Apriori algorithm Cooperative vehicle-infrastructure warning (CVIW) applications: people’s willingness to pay and perceived importance Joint optimization of fixed route bus networks and complementary paratransit service areas Evaluating the effectiveness of engineering countermeasures at yellow dilemma zone: a driving simulator-based study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1