Pandemic management, citizens and the Indian Smart cities: Reflections from the right to the smart city and the digital divide

Q1 Social Sciences City, Culture and Society Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ccs.2022.100474
Maitrayee Mullick, Archana Patnaik
{"title":"Pandemic management, citizens and the Indian Smart cities: Reflections from the right to the smart city and the digital divide","authors":"Maitrayee Mullick,&nbsp;Archana Patnaik","doi":"10.1016/j.ccs.2022.100474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The technologically endowed Smart Cities take credit for managing the COVID-19 pandemic more effectively than other urban centers. However, Indian smart cities seemed unprepared for the outbreak, with reported highest cases of death and positivity rates. Thus, it becomes essential to understand why these smart cities could not handle the pandemic despite their technologically advanced infrastructures and the citizen’s role in managing it. This paper analyzes the impact of the Smart City Mission (SCM) interventions from a citizen-centric perspective and its influence on pandemic management and citizen inclusivity. The study draws from the right to the smart city framework along with stages of the digital divide. The study conducted a content analysis using secondary sources like published and unpublished papers, policy reports, and news analyses spanning the timeline of 2015-2022. The analysis infers that the lack of initiatives to link marginalized citizens with Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) through the SCM policy led to the underutilization of the various initiatives launched during the pandemic, deepening the digital divide. The deduction from the analysis highlights that the ‘<em>chatur</em> citizens’ act as a <em>solution by transitioning their formal access to ICTs into effective access enabling the marginalized communities to bridge the divide</em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39061,"journal":{"name":"City, Culture and Society","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 100474"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877916622000352/pdfft?md5=69c089a23256f0ece8257f0bc3b23c5e&pid=1-s2.0-S1877916622000352-main.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City, Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877916622000352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The technologically endowed Smart Cities take credit for managing the COVID-19 pandemic more effectively than other urban centers. However, Indian smart cities seemed unprepared for the outbreak, with reported highest cases of death and positivity rates. Thus, it becomes essential to understand why these smart cities could not handle the pandemic despite their technologically advanced infrastructures and the citizen’s role in managing it. This paper analyzes the impact of the Smart City Mission (SCM) interventions from a citizen-centric perspective and its influence on pandemic management and citizen inclusivity. The study draws from the right to the smart city framework along with stages of the digital divide. The study conducted a content analysis using secondary sources like published and unpublished papers, policy reports, and news analyses spanning the timeline of 2015-2022. The analysis infers that the lack of initiatives to link marginalized citizens with Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) through the SCM policy led to the underutilization of the various initiatives launched during the pandemic, deepening the digital divide. The deduction from the analysis highlights that the ‘chatur citizens’ act as a solution by transitioning their formal access to ICTs into effective access enabling the marginalized communities to bridge the divide.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流行病管理、公民和印度智慧城市:从智慧城市权和数字鸿沟的思考
技术赋予的智慧城市比其他城市中心更有效地管理了COVID-19大流行。然而,印度的智慧城市似乎对疫情毫无准备,报告的死亡病例和阳性率最高。因此,有必要了解为什么这些智慧城市拥有技术先进的基础设施和公民在管理方面的作用,却无法应对疫情。本文从以公民为中心的角度分析了智慧城市使命(SCM)干预措施的影响及其对流行病管理和公民包容性的影响。该研究借鉴了智慧城市框架的权利以及数字鸿沟的各个阶段。该研究使用二手资源进行了内容分析,如已发表和未发表的论文、政策报告和新闻分析,时间跨度为2015-2022年。分析推断,由于缺乏通过SCM政策将边缘化公民与信息和通信技术(ict)联系起来的举措,导致疫情期间启动的各种举措未得到充分利用,从而加深了数字鸿沟。从分析中得出的结论强调,“查图尔公民”作为一种解决方案,将其对信息通信技术的正式接入转变为有效接入,使边缘化社区能够弥合鸿沟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
City, Culture and Society
City, Culture and Society Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The public library building as nexus for social interactions: Cases from Helsinki Urban religion and gendered bodies Decoding urban power: Architecture, symbolism and territorial control in Caracas Analysis of contextual factors influencing the development of unplanned settlements: The case of Herat City, Afghanistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1