The Russia–South Korea Relationship after Russia's Invasion of Ukraine and Implications for the U.S.-ROK Alliance

IF 1.3 Asia Policy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1353/asp.2023.0009
Anthony V. Rinna
{"title":"The Russia–South Korea Relationship after Russia's Invasion of Ukraine and Implications for the U.S.-ROK Alliance","authors":"Anthony V. Rinna","doi":"10.1353/asp.2023.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"executive summary:This essay examines the potential for shifts in Russia's strategy toward the Korean Peninsula in light of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine and South Korea's reaction.main argumentFor nearly 30 years, Russia has pursued a strategy of \"diplomatic equidistance\" toward the Korean Peninsula. By striving to maintain relatively balanced ties with both North and South Korea, the Kremlin has attempted to preserve a degree of influence on its eastern periphery in Northeast Asia, which is largely dominated by the U.S. and China. Pyongyang's and Seoul's respective responses to Russia's military aggression in Eastern Europe, however, have opened the possibility that Moscow could shift toward a strategy that favors North Korea over South Korea.policy implications• Should Russia decide to pursue closer ties with North Korea at a time when Russia–South Korea relations have cooled, the Kremlin may find that supporting the North could increase its influence in Northeast Asia as well as present a challenge to the U.S. Nevertheless, Moscow would also risk losing the limited influence on the Korean Peninsula it has acquired as a result of its equidistance strategy.• South Korea faces a period of uncertainty in relations with Russia since the invasion of Ukraine. While it is unlikely that Moscow and Seoul will enact the economic cooperation that they had previously envisioned, South Korea may hope to salvage ties with Russia to improve the balance on the Korean Peninsula. Yet with increased fears that North Korea–Russia relations may strengthen, South Korea has reason to be skeptical of cooperation.• The U.S. will need to be prepared for several possible developments in terms of Russia's standing on the Korean Peninsula. Should South Korea elect to try to preserve cooperation with Russia, this may cause a further rift in the U.S.–South Korea alliance. If Moscow doubles down on its relationship with Pyongyang, Seoul and Washington will need to be prepared to jointly address such a development with implications for the Northeast Asian subregion and Russia-U.S. ties.","PeriodicalId":53442,"journal":{"name":"Asia Policy","volume":"30 1","pages":"113 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2023.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

executive summary:This essay examines the potential for shifts in Russia's strategy toward the Korean Peninsula in light of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine and South Korea's reaction.main argumentFor nearly 30 years, Russia has pursued a strategy of "diplomatic equidistance" toward the Korean Peninsula. By striving to maintain relatively balanced ties with both North and South Korea, the Kremlin has attempted to preserve a degree of influence on its eastern periphery in Northeast Asia, which is largely dominated by the U.S. and China. Pyongyang's and Seoul's respective responses to Russia's military aggression in Eastern Europe, however, have opened the possibility that Moscow could shift toward a strategy that favors North Korea over South Korea.policy implications• Should Russia decide to pursue closer ties with North Korea at a time when Russia–South Korea relations have cooled, the Kremlin may find that supporting the North could increase its influence in Northeast Asia as well as present a challenge to the U.S. Nevertheless, Moscow would also risk losing the limited influence on the Korean Peninsula it has acquired as a result of its equidistance strategy.• South Korea faces a period of uncertainty in relations with Russia since the invasion of Ukraine. While it is unlikely that Moscow and Seoul will enact the economic cooperation that they had previously envisioned, South Korea may hope to salvage ties with Russia to improve the balance on the Korean Peninsula. Yet with increased fears that North Korea–Russia relations may strengthen, South Korea has reason to be skeptical of cooperation.• The U.S. will need to be prepared for several possible developments in terms of Russia's standing on the Korean Peninsula. Should South Korea elect to try to preserve cooperation with Russia, this may cause a further rift in the U.S.–South Korea alliance. If Moscow doubles down on its relationship with Pyongyang, Seoul and Washington will need to be prepared to jointly address such a development with implications for the Northeast Asian subregion and Russia-U.S. ties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯入侵乌克兰后的俄韩关系及其对美韩同盟的影响
摘要:鉴于俄罗斯全面入侵乌克兰和韩国的反应,本文探讨了俄罗斯对朝鲜半岛战略转变的可能性。近30年来,俄罗斯对朝鲜半岛奉行“外交等距”战略。通过努力与朝鲜和韩国保持相对平衡的关系,克里姆林宫试图在东北亚的东部边缘地区保持一定程度的影响力,该地区主要由美国和中国主导。然而,朝鲜和韩国各自对俄罗斯在东欧的军事侵略的反应,已经开启了莫斯科转向对朝鲜而不是对韩国的战略的可能性。•在俄韩关系降温之际,如果俄罗斯决定与朝鲜建立更紧密的关系,克里姆林宫可能会发现,支持朝鲜可能会增加其在东北亚的影响力,同时也会对美国构成挑战。然而,莫斯科也有可能失去其凭借“等距战略”在朝鲜半岛获得的有限影响力。•自入侵乌克兰以来,韩国与俄罗斯的关系面临一段不确定时期。虽然莫斯科和首尔不太可能实现他们之前设想的经济合作,但韩国可能希望挽救与俄罗斯的关系,以改善朝鲜半岛的平衡。然而,随着人们越来越担心朝鲜与俄罗斯的关系可能会加强,韩国有理由对合作持怀疑态度。•就俄罗斯在朝鲜半岛的地位而言,美国需要为几个可能的事态发展做好准备。如果韩国选择与俄罗斯保持合作,这可能会导致美韩同盟进一步破裂。如果俄罗斯加倍强化对朝关系,韩美两国需要做好准备,共同应对这一事态发展对东北亚次地区和俄美关系的影响。关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Policy
Asia Policy Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Asia Policy is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal presenting policy-relevant academic research on the Asia-Pacific that draws clear and concise conclusions useful to today’s policymakers.
期刊最新文献
Essence of Indecision: Understanding Indian Security Policy Choices Ambiguity and Decarbonization Pathways in Southeast Asia Gambling on India's Foreign Policy: The Importance of Implementation Introduction: Diplomacy and Ambiguity—Constructing Interests in Cooperation Ambiguity and National Interests: Foreign Policy Frames and U.S.-China Relations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1