Exploratory analysis of the perception of academic researchers about incentives: evidence from a Spanish public university

IF 2.7 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management Pub Date : 2022-10-17 DOI:10.1080/1360080X.2022.2136380
Félix Guerrero-Alba, Fernando Martín‐Alcázar, Gonzalo Sánchez-Gardey
{"title":"Exploratory analysis of the perception of academic researchers about incentives: evidence from a Spanish public university","authors":"Félix Guerrero-Alba, Fernando Martín‐Alcázar, Gonzalo Sánchez-Gardey","doi":"10.1080/1360080X.2022.2136380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The perception of academic researchers on management instruments has generated significant controversy in the literature. Studies have highlighted that these perceptions affect research performance more than management itself. This work addresses this issue by proposing a subjective measurement that explains research incentives in a public university. The study was conducted using a mixed-methodology approach. To initially identify the research incentives, a Delphi study was developed through the inclusion of 62 experts. Based on the Delphi results, to contrast the internal composition of the research incentive system, 259 academic researchers from a Spanish university were subjected to an exploratory factor analysis. The results revealed four potential incentives that were perceived by the researchers. The analysis of these factors contributes to the debate about the way in which academic managers can promote the design of effective incentives that could be assumed and accepted by researchers.","PeriodicalId":51489,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management","volume":"44 1","pages":"613 - 629"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2022.2136380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The perception of academic researchers on management instruments has generated significant controversy in the literature. Studies have highlighted that these perceptions affect research performance more than management itself. This work addresses this issue by proposing a subjective measurement that explains research incentives in a public university. The study was conducted using a mixed-methodology approach. To initially identify the research incentives, a Delphi study was developed through the inclusion of 62 experts. Based on the Delphi results, to contrast the internal composition of the research incentive system, 259 academic researchers from a Spanish university were subjected to an exploratory factor analysis. The results revealed four potential incentives that were perceived by the researchers. The analysis of these factors contributes to the debate about the way in which academic managers can promote the design of effective incentives that could be assumed and accepted by researchers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术研究者对激励认知的探索性分析:来自西班牙一所公立大学的证据
学术研究人员对管理工具的看法在文献中引发了重大争议。研究强调,这些认知比管理本身更能影响研究绩效。这项工作通过提出一种解释公立大学研究动机的主观测量方法来解决这个问题。该研究采用混合方法进行。为了初步确定研究动机,通过纳入62名专家进行了德尔菲研究。基于德尔菲结果,对西班牙一所大学的259名学术研究人员进行了探索性因素分析,以对比研究激励体系的内部构成。研究结果揭示了研究人员感知到的四种潜在激励因素。对这些因素的分析有助于就学术管理者如何促进研究人员假设和接受的有效激励措施的设计展开辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management is an international journal of professional experience and ideas in post-secondary education. It is a must read for those seeking to influence educational policy making. The journal also aims to be of use to managers and senior academic staff who seek to place their work and interests in a broad context and influence educational policy and practice.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the notion of feminine leadership in Kuwait’s private universities Using self-determination theory as a lens to create sustainable futures for teaching and education focused academics in higher education in Australia What makes a Thesis by Publication? An international study of policy requirements and restrictions Growth mindsets in academics and academia: a review of influence and interventions Academic excellence initiatives: global perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1