Creating Equitable Opportunities: The Thoughts of Two Administrator Rhetoricians

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION Rhetoric & Public Affairs Pub Date : 2021-08-24 DOI:10.14321/rhetpublaffa.24.1-2.0169
K. Wilson, Kent A. Ono
{"title":"Creating Equitable Opportunities: The Thoughts of Two Administrator Rhetoricians","authors":"K. Wilson, Kent A. Ono","doi":"10.14321/rhetpublaffa.24.1-2.0169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In this article, the authors draw on their personal experiences as mid-career administrators and scholars of color to consider both the structures that limit, and opportunities for equity and social justice in, academic institutions. Although the primary logics that shape academic institutions serve to marginalize certain types of scholars and scholarship, they argue that institutions also contain gaps and contradictions where resistance is possible and from which alternative structures can be built. They identify and define three critical practices—storytelling, structural transformation, and allyship—that administrators can use to create a more equitable academy. The authors discuss why they believe it is important to invest in administrative and professional association service, where they have witnessed the gaps that make transformation possible, and how they have implemented critical administrative praxes.","PeriodicalId":45013,"journal":{"name":"Rhetoric & Public Affairs","volume":"24 1","pages":"169 - 189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhetoric & Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.24.1-2.0169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:In this article, the authors draw on their personal experiences as mid-career administrators and scholars of color to consider both the structures that limit, and opportunities for equity and social justice in, academic institutions. Although the primary logics that shape academic institutions serve to marginalize certain types of scholars and scholarship, they argue that institutions also contain gaps and contradictions where resistance is possible and from which alternative structures can be built. They identify and define three critical practices—storytelling, structural transformation, and allyship—that administrators can use to create a more equitable academy. The authors discuss why they believe it is important to invest in administrative and professional association service, where they have witnessed the gaps that make transformation possible, and how they have implemented critical administrative praxes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创造公平机会:两位行政修辞学家的思考
摘要:在这篇文章中,作者利用他们作为职业中期管理者和有色人种学者的个人经历来思考学术机构中限制公平和社会正义的结构和机会。尽管塑造学术机构的主要逻辑是将某些类型的学者和学术边缘化,但他们认为,机构也包含着可能产生抵抗的差距和矛盾,并可以从中建立替代结构。他们确定并定义了三个关键的实践——讲故事、结构转型和结盟——管理者可以利用这些实践来创建一个更公平的学院。作者讨论了为什么他们认为投资于管理和专业协会服务很重要,他们在哪些方面目睹了使转型成为可能的差距,以及他们如何实施关键的管理实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rhetoric & Public Affairs
Rhetoric & Public Affairs COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Satire as the Comic Public Sphere: Postmodern "Truthiness" and Civic Engagement by James E. Caron (review) Designing "The People": Constitutive Fractures in Contemporary Collectives Replacing Notorious: Barret, Ginsburg, and Postfeminist Positioning Informing a Nation: The Newspaper Presidency of Thomas Jefferson by Mel Laracey (review) Market Affect and the Rhetoric of Political Economic Debates by Catherine Chaput (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1