“Plenty of Vaccines, but Not Enough Arms”: A Social-Ecological Approach to COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Rural US Communities

Leandra M. Smollin, Amy Lubitow
{"title":"“Plenty of Vaccines, but Not Enough Arms”: A Social-Ecological Approach to COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Rural US Communities","authors":"Leandra M. Smollin, Amy Lubitow","doi":"10.52678/001c.75374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article leads off the special issue’s first section on Health, Mental Health, and Well-Being Today Among Marginalized Populations. It draws from multiple disciplines to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in rural areas of the United States. Presenting a synthesis of literature on rural vaccine hesitancy and emerging research and scientific opinion on COVID 19, we identify likely factors in rural decision-making about COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccination is underway, with plans to provide access to every U.S. resident. However, polls suggest vaccine hesitancy may compromise our ability to reach the goal of herd immunity, and rural residents express more hesitancy than their urban and suburban counterparts. Drawing on Thomson et al.’s (2016) identification of five dimensions of vaccine uptake, we use a social-ecological approach to propose actions to increase vaccine acceptance on individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and cultural levels. This conceptual paper is a starting point for rural health and human services administrators and practitioners seeking to reduce COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in their communities in this early stage of COVID-19 vaccination.","PeriodicalId":73782,"journal":{"name":"Journal of human services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of human services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52678/001c.75374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article leads off the special issue’s first section on Health, Mental Health, and Well-Being Today Among Marginalized Populations. It draws from multiple disciplines to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in rural areas of the United States. Presenting a synthesis of literature on rural vaccine hesitancy and emerging research and scientific opinion on COVID 19, we identify likely factors in rural decision-making about COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccination is underway, with plans to provide access to every U.S. resident. However, polls suggest vaccine hesitancy may compromise our ability to reach the goal of herd immunity, and rural residents express more hesitancy than their urban and suburban counterparts. Drawing on Thomson et al.’s (2016) identification of five dimensions of vaccine uptake, we use a social-ecological approach to propose actions to increase vaccine acceptance on individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and cultural levels. This conceptual paper is a starting point for rural health and human services administrators and practitioners seeking to reduce COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in their communities in this early stage of COVID-19 vaccination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“疫苗充足,但武器不足”:美国农村社区新冠肺炎疫苗犹豫的社会生态方法
这篇文章引出了特刊的第一部分“健康、心理健康和当今边缘化人群的幸福”。它借鉴了多个学科来解决美国农村地区COVID-19疫苗犹豫问题。本文综合了有关农村疫苗犹豫的文献和有关COVID-19的新兴研究和科学意见,确定了农村疫苗接种决策的可能因素。疫苗接种正在进行中,计划为每个美国居民提供接种机会。然而,民意调查显示,疫苗犹豫可能会损害我们实现群体免疫目标的能力,农村居民比城市和郊区的居民表现出更多的犹豫。根据Thomson等人(2016)确定的疫苗摄取的五个维度,我们使用社会生态学方法提出在个人、人际、组织、社区和文化层面提高疫苗接受度的行动。这篇概念性论文是农村卫生和人类服务管理人员和从业人员在COVID-19疫苗接种的早期阶段寻求减少其社区中COVID-19疫苗犹豫的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation Model for Motivational Interviewing Training in a Community College Human Services Program Non-Traditional Adult Learners After COVID-19: Applying National Standards for Online Teaching in Human Service Education Knowledge of Legislation as an Ethical Principle for Undergraduate Rehabilitation Students The Current Role of Remote Human Services Internships: A Follow-Up Study The Organizational Outcomes of Supervision in Settings Addressing Violence Against Women: A Scoping Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1