Techno-Economic and Enviroeconomic Analysis Review of Distinct Passive and Active Solar Distillation Still

Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.5541/ijot.1012365
Manish Sanserwal, Pushpendra Singh
{"title":"Techno-Economic and Enviroeconomic Analysis Review of Distinct Passive and Active Solar Distillation Still","authors":"Manish Sanserwal, Pushpendra Singh","doi":"10.5541/ijot.1012365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water scarcity is an issue that stems from the overconsumption and misuse of fresh water supplies, which leads to shortages and decreased quality of life. It most affects developing countries that do not have the infrastructure in place to mitigate these factors. Solar still become most suitable method for water purification in these types of places due to its cheapness and easily made from locally available materials. Current paper concentrate on a detailed techno-economic and enviroeconomic analysis of distinct configurations of active and passive solar distillation stills. Distilled water production, cost per litres, environmental cost comparison has been done between different types of passive and active solar still. Active solar still has a higher system cost compared to passive solar due to the addition of thermal energy by different components and mechanisms. Based on the results, minimum cost per litre is obtained for passive conventional solar still with the spherical ball as heat storage material and in case of active solar still, with PV module, reflectors, air-cooling technique are 0.0136 $/l and 0.0092 $/l, respectively. On the basis of energy, the highest environmental cost was found for AMSSFS air-cooled with evacuated mode (1456.38 $), while the lowest was found for active solar stills with N - Flat Plate Collectors (44 $).","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.1012365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Water scarcity is an issue that stems from the overconsumption and misuse of fresh water supplies, which leads to shortages and decreased quality of life. It most affects developing countries that do not have the infrastructure in place to mitigate these factors. Solar still become most suitable method for water purification in these types of places due to its cheapness and easily made from locally available materials. Current paper concentrate on a detailed techno-economic and enviroeconomic analysis of distinct configurations of active and passive solar distillation stills. Distilled water production, cost per litres, environmental cost comparison has been done between different types of passive and active solar still. Active solar still has a higher system cost compared to passive solar due to the addition of thermal energy by different components and mechanisms. Based on the results, minimum cost per litre is obtained for passive conventional solar still with the spherical ball as heat storage material and in case of active solar still, with PV module, reflectors, air-cooling technique are 0.0136 $/l and 0.0092 $/l, respectively. On the basis of energy, the highest environmental cost was found for AMSSFS air-cooled with evacuated mode (1456.38 $), while the lowest was found for active solar stills with N - Flat Plate Collectors (44 $).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
不同被动式和主动式太阳蒸馏器的技术经济和环境经济分析综述
缺水是一个源于过度消费和滥用淡水供应的问题,这导致了水资源短缺和生活质量下降。它对那些没有缓解这些因素的基础设施的发展中国家影响最大。太阳能仍然是这些地方最适合的净水方法,因为它价格低廉,而且很容易用当地可用的材料制成。目前的论文集中于对主动和被动太阳能蒸馏釜的不同配置进行详细的技术经济和环境经济分析。蒸馏水生产、每升成本、环境成本在不同类型的被动式和主动式太阳能蒸馏器之间进行了比较。由于不同的组件和机制增加了热能,有源太阳能与无源太阳能相比仍然具有更高的系统成本。基于这些结果,使用球形球作为储热材料的被动式传统太阳能蒸馏器和使用光伏模块、散热器和空气冷却技术的主动式太阳能蒸馏器的每升最低成本分别为0.0136$/l和0.0092$/l。基于能源,AMSSFS采用抽空模式风冷的环境成本最高(1456.38美元),而采用N-平板收集器的有源太阳能蒸馏器的环境成本最低(44美元)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1