Policy Diffusion Through Multiple Streams: The (Non‐)Adoption of Energy Conservation Building Code in India

IF 4.1 2区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Policy Studies Journal Pub Date : 2021-01-03 DOI:10.1111/psj.12415
N. Goyal
{"title":"Policy Diffusion Through Multiple Streams: The (Non‐)Adoption of Energy Conservation Building Code in India","authors":"N. Goyal","doi":"10.1111/psj.12415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the diffusion of policy innovations can promote sustainability, how this process can be accelerated remains unclear. I address this gap by conceptualizing policy transfer and policy diffusion using the multiple streams framework (MSF) and developing hypotheses to connect them. I apply this theorization to explain the limited spread of the energy conservation building code (ECBC) in India by combining a process trace of policy adoption in the embedded case of Andhra Pradesh with a dyadic event history analysis of state-level diffusion during 2012-18. The data for this study are collated from official statistics, elite interviews, news reports, policy documents, and secondary literature. The qualitative analysis shows that policy transfer to Andhra Pradesh occurred when external influence and prior adoption elsewhere were used by a policy entrepreneur to exploit a window of opportunity and couple problem, policy, and politics in the state; the dyadic analysis demonstrates that policy diffusion was influenced by the interaction among the structural characteristics of the problem, policy, and politics streams. I conclude with the implications for research on policy diffusion and the MSF as well as the relevance of the findings for promoting policy innovation for a sustainable energy transition. Hypothesis 3: If external policy activity raises the expectation on the government to take a decision and/or increases its willingness to do so, the politics stream is more likely to be ripe for coupling.","PeriodicalId":48154,"journal":{"name":"Policy Studies Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/psj.12415","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12415","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Although the diffusion of policy innovations can promote sustainability, how this process can be accelerated remains unclear. I address this gap by conceptualizing policy transfer and policy diffusion using the multiple streams framework (MSF) and developing hypotheses to connect them. I apply this theorization to explain the limited spread of the energy conservation building code (ECBC) in India by combining a process trace of policy adoption in the embedded case of Andhra Pradesh with a dyadic event history analysis of state-level diffusion during 2012-18. The data for this study are collated from official statistics, elite interviews, news reports, policy documents, and secondary literature. The qualitative analysis shows that policy transfer to Andhra Pradesh occurred when external influence and prior adoption elsewhere were used by a policy entrepreneur to exploit a window of opportunity and couple problem, policy, and politics in the state; the dyadic analysis demonstrates that policy diffusion was influenced by the interaction among the structural characteristics of the problem, policy, and politics streams. I conclude with the implications for research on policy diffusion and the MSF as well as the relevance of the findings for promoting policy innovation for a sustainable energy transition. Hypothesis 3: If external policy activity raises the expectation on the government to take a decision and/or increases its willingness to do so, the politics stream is more likely to be ripe for coupling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过多种渠道的政策扩散:印度节能建筑规范的(非)采用
尽管政策创新的传播可以促进可持续性,但如何加快这一进程仍不清楚。我通过使用多流框架(MSF)对政策转移和政策扩散进行概念化,并提出将它们联系起来的假设,来解决这一差距。我将这一理论应用于解释节能建筑规范(ECBC)在印度的有限传播,方法是将安得拉邦嵌入式案例中政策采用的过程轨迹与2012-18年州级传播的二元事件历史分析相结合。这项研究的数据来自官方统计数据、精英访谈、新闻报道、政策文件和二手文献。定性分析表明,当政策企业家利用外部影响和先前在其他地方采用政策来利用机会之窗并结合该邦的问题、政策和政治时,就会发生向安得拉邦的政策转移;二元分析表明,政策扩散受问题结构特征、政策流和政治流相互作用的影响。最后,我介绍了对政策扩散和无国界医生研究的启示,以及研究结果对促进可持续能源转型的政策创新的相关性。假设3:如果外部政策活动提高了人们对政府做出决定的期望和/或提高了政府做出决策的意愿,那么政治流更有可能耦合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: As the principal outlet for the Public Policy Section of the American Political Science Association and for the Policy Studies Organization (PSO), the Policy Studies Journal (PSJ) is the premier channel for the publication of public policy research. PSJ is best characterized as an outlet for theoretically and empirically grounded research on policy process and policy analysis. More specifically, we aim to publish articles that advance public policy theory, explicitly articulate its methods of data collection and analysis, and provide clear descriptions of how their work advances the literature.
期刊最新文献
Manifesting symbolic representation through collaborative policymaking Whose water crisis? How policy responses to acute environmental change widen inequality Narrative spillover: A narrative policy framework analysis of critical race theory discourse at multiple levels Athletic competition between the states: The rapid spread of Name, Image, Likeness laws and why it matters for understanding policy diffusion Editorial introduction: Exploring policy theories, narratives, and policing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1