Making Use of the Literacy Debate: Literacy, Citizenship, and Brave New World Vol. 53, No. 1 (Fall 1990)

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE CEA CRITIC Pub Date : 2021-09-02 DOI:10.1353/cea.2021.0018
{"title":"Making Use of the Literacy Debate: Literacy, Citizenship, and Brave New World Vol. 53, No. 1 (Fall 1990)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/cea.2021.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:[T]here are two competing ways to look at literacy: as information that one acquires—that can be taught to students—or as an ability that teachers can help students to develop…. [T]eachers of secondary and college-level reading and writing can respond to the literacy wars by examining and applying, with their students, the literacy theories under robust debate, thereby making awareness of the conflict part of students' mastery of literacy and of literary texts. Such spirited discussion of literacy itself can achieve goals on both sides in the literacy debate: both familiarity with the documents of our culture and ability to look analytically at those documents, to use literacy to influence the culture. To clarify this approach, I propose a reading of Aldous Huxley's Brave New World that explores and tests some current theories of literacy.","PeriodicalId":41558,"journal":{"name":"CEA CRITIC","volume":"83 1","pages":"167 - 177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEA CRITIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cea.2021.0018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:[T]here are two competing ways to look at literacy: as information that one acquires—that can be taught to students—or as an ability that teachers can help students to develop…. [T]eachers of secondary and college-level reading and writing can respond to the literacy wars by examining and applying, with their students, the literacy theories under robust debate, thereby making awareness of the conflict part of students' mastery of literacy and of literary texts. Such spirited discussion of literacy itself can achieve goals on both sides in the literacy debate: both familiarity with the documents of our culture and ability to look analytically at those documents, to use literacy to influence the culture. To clarify this approach, I propose a reading of Aldous Huxley's Brave New World that explores and tests some current theories of literacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《利用读写能力辩论:读写能力、公民身份和美丽新世界》第53卷第1期(1990年秋季)
摘要:这里有两种相互竞争的方式来看待读写能力:作为一个人获得的信息——可以教给学生——或者作为一种教师可以帮助学生发展的能力....[T]中学和大学水平的阅读和写作教师可以通过与学生一起检查和应用激烈辩论中的识字理论来应对识字战争,从而意识到学生掌握识字和文学文本的冲突。这种对读写能力本身的热烈讨论可以在读写能力辩论中达到双方的目标:既熟悉我们的文化文献,又有能力分析这些文献,利用读写能力来影响文化。为了澄清这种方法,我建议阅读奥尔德斯·赫胥黎的《美丽新世界》,探索和测试一些当前的识字理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CEA CRITIC
CEA CRITIC LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Empathy and Trauma: A Cognitive Approach to Mrs. Dalloway Sound Presentation of the Silent History: Orature in Yvonne Vera's The Stone Virgins "How we go on": Tradition's Talent and the Individual Poet in Gary Snyder's "Axe Handles" Looking Backwards: Tradition, the Temporal, and the Timeless Notebooking Embodied Sonico-Musical Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1