Civic Identity: Diversity of Meanings and Achievement of Solidarity

M. Mchedlova, Hovhannes L. Sargsyan
{"title":"Civic Identity: Diversity of Meanings and Achievement of Solidarity","authors":"M. Mchedlova, Hovhannes L. Sargsyan","doi":"10.22363/2313-1438-2021-23-4-648-658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of identity reflects the ongoing shifts in political theories when external parameters that did not previously fall into the optics of political research become a part of political reflection and political analysis. Emphasizing sociocultural issues captures not only the departure from the linear normativity of political theory and pragmatics but also the search for modern explanatory models that cannot be reduced merely to institutional determinism. The controversy and ambiguity of the civic identity concept are imposed on the need for interpreting the formation of civic communities in the newly emerged independent countries after the collapse of the Soviet Union (on the example of Russia and Armenia), including the possibilities of protest and project identity. Methodologically the article is based on the perception that the construction of civic identity cannot be reduced to the normative understanding only. The authors bring out the causal complexes that predetermine the construction of civic identity, while also highlighting the differences in how civic communities and their value focuses are perceived and constructed in Russia and Armenia. The authors also define the general features of civic identity, which can be described as a common basis of solidarity, the removal of particularity and a shared vision of the future.","PeriodicalId":32346,"journal":{"name":"RUDN Journal of Political Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUDN Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2021-23-4-648-658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of identity reflects the ongoing shifts in political theories when external parameters that did not previously fall into the optics of political research become a part of political reflection and political analysis. Emphasizing sociocultural issues captures not only the departure from the linear normativity of political theory and pragmatics but also the search for modern explanatory models that cannot be reduced merely to institutional determinism. The controversy and ambiguity of the civic identity concept are imposed on the need for interpreting the formation of civic communities in the newly emerged independent countries after the collapse of the Soviet Union (on the example of Russia and Armenia), including the possibilities of protest and project identity. Methodologically the article is based on the perception that the construction of civic identity cannot be reduced to the normative understanding only. The authors bring out the causal complexes that predetermine the construction of civic identity, while also highlighting the differences in how civic communities and their value focuses are perceived and constructed in Russia and Armenia. The authors also define the general features of civic identity, which can be described as a common basis of solidarity, the removal of particularity and a shared vision of the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公民认同:意义的多样性与团结的成就
身份的概念反映了政治理论的持续变化,当以前不属于政治研究光学的外部参数成为政治反思和政治分析的一部分时。强调社会文化问题不仅体现了对政治理论和语用学线性规范的背离,也体现了对现代解释模型的探索,这些模型不能仅仅归结为制度决定论。公民认同概念的争议性和模糊性是强加于解释苏联解体后新出现的独立国家(以俄罗斯和亚美尼亚为例)公民社区形成的需要,包括抗议和项目认同的可能性。在方法论上,本文基于这样一种认识,即公民认同的建构不能仅仅归结为规范性的理解。作者提出了预先决定公民身份构建的因果关系,同时也强调了俄罗斯和亚美尼亚公民社区及其价值焦点的感知和构建方式的差异。作者还界定了公民认同的一般特征,可以将其描述为团结的共同基础,消除特殊性和对未来的共同看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Political Administration VS Political Competition Under Neo-Authoritarian Rule Political Theology of Contingency: Reading Materialists with Carl Schmitt New dilemmas of the «just war» theory Integration of Migrants Through the Lens of a Constructivist Approach to Ethnicity Political Science in Search of New Approaches: Introducing the Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1