An Examination of Interstate Differences in Eligibility Criteria for Deafblindness

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1177/0145482X231178832
Hilary E. Travers, Rachel Anne Schles
{"title":"An Examination of Interstate Differences in Eligibility Criteria for Deafblindness","authors":"Hilary E. Travers, Rachel Anne Schles","doi":"10.1177/0145482X231178832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study examined the interstate variability in eligibility criteria for the disability category of deafblindness. Methods: We systematically reviewed and coded information related to the location of state data, the use of federal language in state definitions, additional eligibility criteria (i.e., disability eligibility requirements, evaluative components), and required eligibility team members (i.e., specific school staff mentioned by profession to be present for eligibility determinations) for every U.S. state and territory, including Washington, DC. Results: We located deafblind eligibility data for 54 of 56 states. Thirty-one states provided an operationalized definition of deafblindness that included additional eligibility criteria. Seventeen states required students to first be found eligible as having visual and hearing impairments before they could be considered deafblind. Very few states required any eligibility team members with knowledge of sensory impairments or communication disorders to determine deafblind eligibility. Discussion: The findings of this work suggest there is large interstate variability in eligibility criteria for deafblindness. A universal operational definition of deafblindness with defined eligibility criteria may be necessary to ensure consistency in identification and access to appropriate personnel and services across states. Implications for Practitioners: Understanding the eligibility requirements in each state is critical to helping appropriately identify qualifying students with deafblindness. Practitioners should advocate for the identification of deafblind students by keeping any sensory-related information at the forefront of all eligibility discussions.","PeriodicalId":47438,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness","volume":"117 1","pages":"212 - 223"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X231178832","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study examined the interstate variability in eligibility criteria for the disability category of deafblindness. Methods: We systematically reviewed and coded information related to the location of state data, the use of federal language in state definitions, additional eligibility criteria (i.e., disability eligibility requirements, evaluative components), and required eligibility team members (i.e., specific school staff mentioned by profession to be present for eligibility determinations) for every U.S. state and territory, including Washington, DC. Results: We located deafblind eligibility data for 54 of 56 states. Thirty-one states provided an operationalized definition of deafblindness that included additional eligibility criteria. Seventeen states required students to first be found eligible as having visual and hearing impairments before they could be considered deafblind. Very few states required any eligibility team members with knowledge of sensory impairments or communication disorders to determine deafblind eligibility. Discussion: The findings of this work suggest there is large interstate variability in eligibility criteria for deafblindness. A universal operational definition of deafblindness with defined eligibility criteria may be necessary to ensure consistency in identification and access to appropriate personnel and services across states. Implications for Practitioners: Understanding the eligibility requirements in each state is critical to helping appropriately identify qualifying students with deafblindness. Practitioners should advocate for the identification of deafblind students by keeping any sensory-related information at the forefront of all eligibility discussions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家间聋人资格标准差异的检验
引言:这项研究考察了聋哑残疾类别资格标准的州际差异。方法:我们系统地审查和编码了与州数据的位置、州定义中联邦语言的使用、其他资格标准(即残疾资格要求、评估组成部分)、,以及包括华盛顿特区在内的每个美国州和地区所需的资格团队成员(即专业提及的特定学校工作人员)。结果:我们找到了56个州中54个州的聋哑人资格数据。31个州提供了一个可操作的盲症定义,其中包括额外的资格标准。17个州要求学生首先被认定有视力和听力障碍,然后才能被视为聋哑人。很少有州要求任何了解感官障碍或沟通障碍的资格小组成员来确定聋哑人的资格。讨论:这项工作的结果表明,聋哑人的资格标准存在很大的州际差异。为了确保各州在识别和获得适当人员和服务方面的一致性,可能需要一个具有明确资格标准的盲症通用操作定义。对从业者的启示:了解每个州的资格要求对于帮助适当识别符合资格的聋哑学生至关重要。从业者应通过将任何与感官相关的信息放在所有资格讨论的首位,来倡导对聋哑学生的识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness is the essential professional resource for information about visual impairment (that is, blindness or low vision). The international peer-reviewed journal of record in the field, it delivers current research and best practice information, commentary from authoritative experts on critical topics, News From the Field, and a calendar of important events. Practitioners and researchers, policymakers and administrators, counselors and advocates rely on JVIB for its delivery of cutting-edge research and the most up-to-date practices in the field of visual impairment and blindness. Available in print and online 24/7, JVIB offers immediate access to information from the leading researchers, teachers of students with visual impairments (often referred to as TVIs), orientation and mobility (O&M) practitioners, vision rehabilitation therapists (often referred to as VRTs), early interventionists, and low vision therapists (often referred to as LVTs) in the field.
期刊最新文献
A graded neonatal mouse model of necrotizing enterocolitis demonstrates that mild enterocolitis is sufficient to activate microglia and increase cerebral cytokine expression. Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing a Job Search Intervention for Adults With Visual Impairments via Videoconferencing. Components of Valid Learning Media Assessments Using Checklists as a Vocational Rehabilitation Tool for Employed Consumers JVIB Peer Reviewers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1