COVID-19 case fatality rate in the context of healthcare system organization and EHCI performance: Focus on the Visegrad (V4) countries

IF 0.7 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Acta Oeconomica Pub Date : 2021-11-25 DOI:10.1556/032.2021.00028
P. Pazitny, D. Kandilaki, R. Mužik, B. Benkova
{"title":"COVID-19 case fatality rate in the context of healthcare system organization and EHCI performance: Focus on the Visegrad (V4) countries","authors":"P. Pazitny, D. Kandilaki, R. Mužik, B. Benkova","doi":"10.1556/032.2021.00028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article tries to explain the differences in COVID-19 case fatality rate (CFR) in 22 European countries by their type of organization and performance level of their healthcare systems. The CFR is taken here as the most important indicator since it measures the ratio between COVID deaths and COVID cases. In our view, this indicator reflects the true performance of the healthcare system, as this indicator is freed form public health interventions, like testing, lockdowns or social distancing.\n Our research is also unique, because it sees the healthcare system in a holistic way and tries to explain the CFR not by individual risk factors, socioeconomic indicators, or partial system parameters, but by using a complex healthcare system classification method adopted from Isabelle Joumard and an overall healthcare system performance index adopted from European Health Consumer Index (EHCI).\n The main results are twofold. First, higher EHCI score is related to lower CFR. So, the countries are cumulated basically in two quadrants: High EHCI performers (score 790 and higher) with low CFR (below 1.93%) and low EHCI performers with high COVID CFR. Second, apart from Czech Republic, the V4 countries are not doing very well in fighting COVID. Hungary is the worst, not only from the V4 group, but the worst from the whole list of 22 European countries included in this research. Poland is doing better, but still is high above the median CFR. Slovakia was the second worst from the V4 group. Czech Republic is the best V4 performer and the only country with EHCI score lower than median and CFR also lower than the median.","PeriodicalId":45104,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oeconomica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oeconomica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2021.00028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This article tries to explain the differences in COVID-19 case fatality rate (CFR) in 22 European countries by their type of organization and performance level of their healthcare systems. The CFR is taken here as the most important indicator since it measures the ratio between COVID deaths and COVID cases. In our view, this indicator reflects the true performance of the healthcare system, as this indicator is freed form public health interventions, like testing, lockdowns or social distancing. Our research is also unique, because it sees the healthcare system in a holistic way and tries to explain the CFR not by individual risk factors, socioeconomic indicators, or partial system parameters, but by using a complex healthcare system classification method adopted from Isabelle Joumard and an overall healthcare system performance index adopted from European Health Consumer Index (EHCI). The main results are twofold. First, higher EHCI score is related to lower CFR. So, the countries are cumulated basically in two quadrants: High EHCI performers (score 790 and higher) with low CFR (below 1.93%) and low EHCI performers with high COVID CFR. Second, apart from Czech Republic, the V4 countries are not doing very well in fighting COVID. Hungary is the worst, not only from the V4 group, but the worst from the whole list of 22 European countries included in this research. Poland is doing better, but still is high above the median CFR. Slovakia was the second worst from the V4 group. Czech Republic is the best V4 performer and the only country with EHCI score lower than median and CFR also lower than the median.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗系统组织和EHCI绩效背景下的新冠肺炎病死率:关注维舍格勒(V4)国家
本文试图通过医疗保健系统的组织类型和绩效水平来解释22个欧洲国家COVID-19病例死亡率(CFR)的差异。这里将病死率作为最重要的指标,因为它衡量的是COVID - 19死亡人数与COVID - 19病例的比率。我们认为,该指标反映了卫生保健系统的真实表现,因为该指标不受公共卫生干预措施的影响,如检测、封锁或保持社交距离。我们的研究也很独特,因为它以整体的方式看待医疗保健系统,并试图通过使用Isabelle Joumard采用的复杂医疗保健系统分类方法和采用欧洲健康消费者指数(EHCI)的整体医疗保健系统绩效指数来解释CFR,而不是通过个体风险因素,社会经济指标或部分系统参数。主要结果是双重的。第一,EHCI评分越高,CFR越低。因此,这些国家基本上分为两个象限:高EHCI表现者(得分790及以上),低病死率(低于1.93%)和低EHCI表现者,高病死率。其次,除捷克共和国外,V4国家在抗击COVID方面做得不是很好。匈牙利是最差的,不仅在V4组中,而且在这项研究的整个22个欧洲国家名单中也是最差的。波兰做得更好,但仍高于CFR的中位数。斯洛伐克在V4组中排名倒数第二。捷克共和国是V4中表现最好的国家,也是唯一一个EHCI得分低于中位数,CFR也低于中位数的国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oeconomica
Acta Oeconomica ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Acta Oeconomica publishes articles on Eastern European and Hungarian economic transition, theoretical and general issues of the transition process, economic policy, econometrics and mathematical economics. Space is also devoted to international economics, European integration, labour economics, industrial organisation, finance and business economics.Publishes book reviews and advertisements.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the economic freedom of countries: An application of grey factor analysis Bitcoin: The nexus between regulation and recognition Drivers of moral hazard in banks An investigation of the influencing factors of value added tax collection effectiveness in EU Member States Impact of investment and R&D expenditures on company performance in the industry 4.0 era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1