“Hey Mama;” “Dear Sister;” “Sister Love”: Black Women’s Healing and Radical Self-Care through Epistolary Work

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Women Politics & Policy Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/1554477X.2021.1870090
Desireé R. Melonas
{"title":"“Hey Mama;” “Dear Sister;” “Sister Love”: Black Women’s Healing and Radical Self-Care through Epistolary Work","authors":"Desireé R. Melonas","doi":"10.1080/1554477X.2021.1870090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This work is an examination into the act of letter-writing as a mode of radical self-care, paying special attention to the significance of the practice when performed between Black women. Black women’s lived realities often involve confronting both tacit and explicit demands that they censor and deny various aspects of their being, and internalize a set of dominant lies about themselves they’ve been led to believe are true. That being so, I argue that what letter-writing can offer is a rhetorical space of community generated through exchanges between interlocutors, a zone though which Black women are free(er) to express these ostensibly “illicit” aspects if their being and to lay claim to a different, more affirming set of truths around which to construct lines of selfdefinition. I also posit that letter-writing as a practice that demands of individuals to sit, slow-down, and gather themselves, represents a rejection of a neoliberal imperative that urges prioritizing speed and acceleration over ease and taking one’s time. Letter-writingas- slow-work is therefore political not only in its rejection of this imperative, but letter-writing enacted among Black women is a disavowal of neoliberalism and how it masks the reality that that some individuals—across various economic, social, and political domains—are made to more cumbersomely bear the burden of speed and expedition. Specifically, we know that Black women are cast as beings capable of working without ceasing. Thus, when the Black woman sits down to write, she telegraphs a commitment to slowing down and taking care. To illustrate these claims, I deploy my letter-writing experience with my grandmother and reflect on Pat Parker and Audre Lorde’s letter complied in Sister Love (2018).","PeriodicalId":46116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Women Politics & Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1554477X.2021.1870090","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Women Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2021.1870090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT This work is an examination into the act of letter-writing as a mode of radical self-care, paying special attention to the significance of the practice when performed between Black women. Black women’s lived realities often involve confronting both tacit and explicit demands that they censor and deny various aspects of their being, and internalize a set of dominant lies about themselves they’ve been led to believe are true. That being so, I argue that what letter-writing can offer is a rhetorical space of community generated through exchanges between interlocutors, a zone though which Black women are free(er) to express these ostensibly “illicit” aspects if their being and to lay claim to a different, more affirming set of truths around which to construct lines of selfdefinition. I also posit that letter-writing as a practice that demands of individuals to sit, slow-down, and gather themselves, represents a rejection of a neoliberal imperative that urges prioritizing speed and acceleration over ease and taking one’s time. Letter-writingas- slow-work is therefore political not only in its rejection of this imperative, but letter-writing enacted among Black women is a disavowal of neoliberalism and how it masks the reality that that some individuals—across various economic, social, and political domains—are made to more cumbersomely bear the burden of speed and expedition. Specifically, we know that Black women are cast as beings capable of working without ceasing. Thus, when the Black woman sits down to write, she telegraphs a commitment to slowing down and taking care. To illustrate these claims, I deploy my letter-writing experience with my grandmother and reflect on Pat Parker and Audre Lorde’s letter complied in Sister Love (2018).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“嘿,妈妈”;“亲爱的姐姐”;“姐妹之爱”:黑人妇女通过书信工作的治愈和激进的自我照顾
摘要这项工作是对写信行为作为一种激进的自我照顾模式的研究,特别关注在黑人女性之间进行这种行为的意义。黑人女性的生活现实往往包括面对隐性和显性的要求,即她们审查和否认自己存在的各个方面,并内化一系列关于自己的主导谎言,她们被引导相信这些谎言是真的。有鉴于此,我认为写信所能提供的是一个通过对话者之间的交流产生的社区修辞空间,黑人女性可以在这个区域自由地表达这些表面上“非法”的方面,并声称自己拥有一套不同的、更肯定的真理,围绕这些真理构建自我定义的界限。我还认为,写信是一种要求个人坐下来、放慢速度、集中精力的做法,代表着对新自由主义命令的拒绝,这种命令敦促将速度和加速置于轻松和慢慢来之上。因此,写信是一项缓慢的工作,不仅因为它拒绝了这一必要性,而且在黑人女性中实施的写信是对新自由主义的否定,也是对它如何掩盖这样一个现实的否定,即一些人——在各个经济、社会和政治领域——被要求更加艰难地承担速度和速度的负担。具体来说,我们知道黑人女性被塑造成能够不停地工作的人。因此,当这位黑人女性坐下来写作时,她发出了放慢脚步、小心行事的承诺。为了说明这些说法,我运用了我与祖母的写信经历,并反思了Pat Parker和Audre Lorde在《爱的姐姐》(2018)中所写的信。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Women, Politics & Policy explores women and their roles in the political process as well as key policy issues that impact women''s lives. Articles cover a range of tops about political processes from voters to leaders in interest groups and political parties, and office holders in the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government (including the increasingly relevant international bodies such as the European Union and World Trade Organization). They also examine the impact of public policies on women''s lives in areas such as tax and budget issues, poverty reduction and income security, education and employment, care giving, and health and human rights — including violence, safety, and reproductive rights — among many others. This multidisciplinary, international journal presents the work of social scientists — including political scientists, sociologists, economists, and public policy specialists — who study the world through a gendered lens and uncover how gender functions in the political and policy arenas. Throughout, the journal places a special emphasis on the intersection of gender, race/ethnicity, class, and other dimensions of women''s experiences.
期刊最新文献
Gendered Ambivalence: The Structure of Attitudes About Female Candidates Bringing the Ts and (N)Bs to the Table: Estimating Intersectional Candidate Gender Identity and Sexuality Effects on Vote Choice Who is Afraid of More Women in Politics, and Why? An Analysis of Public Opinion in 28 European Countries Feminists, Nationalist, Combatants, Activists. A Conversation with Vjosa Musliu on the Multi-Faceted Role of Women in Kosovo Invisibility or Inclusion? Ethnic Parties, Ethnic Seats, and Gender Quotas and the Representation of Minoritized Women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1