Bacteriological Profile of Wound Infection and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Various Isolates in a Tertiary Care Center

Nabina Maharjan, B. S. Mahawal
{"title":"Bacteriological Profile of Wound Infection and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Various Isolates in a Tertiary Care Center","authors":"Nabina Maharjan, B. S. Mahawal","doi":"10.22502/JLMC.V8I2.367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Wound infection due to various pathogenic microorganisms and the development of resistance to antibiotics is one of the major problems in medical sector. This study aimed to identify the etiological agents of wound infection along with their antibiotic susceptibility. Methods: A total of 400 wound swab specimens were collected from the patients visiting a tertiary center in western Nepal over a period of six months. Thus, collected specimens were processed in Microbiology laboratory for isolation of causative agents. Antibiotic susceptibility test was performed for entire isolates by Kirby Baur disc diffusion method. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus was detected by cefoxitin disc diffusion test and Extended- Spectrum Beta-Lactamases producing Enterobacteriaeae by Phenotypic confirmatory disc diffusion test as recommended by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Results: Two hundred and fifty-nine (64.7%) of specimens were infected, giving rise to 269 different isolates. Among these, 166 (61.7%) were gram positive and 101 (37.6%) were gram negative bacteria. Staphylococcus aureus (n = 130, 48.3%) was the most predominant bacteria followed by Escherichia coli (n=44, 16.3%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=23, 8.5%). Gentamicin followed by co-trimoxazole was the most effective among the tested antibiotics for Staphylococcus aureus. Gentamicin and ciprofloxacin were shown effective for isolated gram-negative bacteria. Conclusion: Fifty-eight (44.6%) of total Staphylococcus aureus were Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus positive and 16 (20.7%) of total Enterobacteriaceae were Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases producers. The increased prevalence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase suggest rational use of antibiotics on the basis of antibiotic sensitivity results.","PeriodicalId":16109,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lumbini Medical College","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lumbini Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22502/JLMC.V8I2.367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction: Wound infection due to various pathogenic microorganisms and the development of resistance to antibiotics is one of the major problems in medical sector. This study aimed to identify the etiological agents of wound infection along with their antibiotic susceptibility. Methods: A total of 400 wound swab specimens were collected from the patients visiting a tertiary center in western Nepal over a period of six months. Thus, collected specimens were processed in Microbiology laboratory for isolation of causative agents. Antibiotic susceptibility test was performed for entire isolates by Kirby Baur disc diffusion method. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus was detected by cefoxitin disc diffusion test and Extended- Spectrum Beta-Lactamases producing Enterobacteriaeae by Phenotypic confirmatory disc diffusion test as recommended by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Results: Two hundred and fifty-nine (64.7%) of specimens were infected, giving rise to 269 different isolates. Among these, 166 (61.7%) were gram positive and 101 (37.6%) were gram negative bacteria. Staphylococcus aureus (n = 130, 48.3%) was the most predominant bacteria followed by Escherichia coli (n=44, 16.3%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=23, 8.5%). Gentamicin followed by co-trimoxazole was the most effective among the tested antibiotics for Staphylococcus aureus. Gentamicin and ciprofloxacin were shown effective for isolated gram-negative bacteria. Conclusion: Fifty-eight (44.6%) of total Staphylococcus aureus were Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus positive and 16 (20.7%) of total Enterobacteriaceae were Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases producers. The increased prevalence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase suggest rational use of antibiotics on the basis of antibiotic sensitivity results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
某三级医疗中心伤口感染的细菌学特征及不同分离株的抗生素敏感性
导读:各种病原微生物引起的伤口感染和抗生素耐药性的发展是医疗领域的主要问题之一。本研究旨在确定伤口感染的病原及其抗生素敏感性。方法:在6个月的时间里,从尼泊尔西部三级医疗中心就诊的患者中收集了400份伤口拭子标本。因此,收集的标本在微生物实验室进行处理,以分离病原体。采用Kirby Baur圆盘扩散法对全株进行药敏试验。采用头孢西丁圆盘扩散试验检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌,采用临床与实验室标准协会推荐的增谱β -内酰胺酶产肠杆菌采用表型确证型圆盘扩散试验检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌。结果:感染标本259份(64.7%),分离菌株269株。其中革兰阳性166例(61.7%),革兰阴性101例(37.6%)。以金黄色葡萄球菌(130株,48.3%)为主,其次为大肠埃希菌(44株,16.3%)和肺炎克雷伯菌(23株,8.5%)。对金黄色葡萄球菌最有效的抗生素是庆大霉素,其次是复方新诺明。庆大霉素和环丙沙星对分离的革兰氏阴性菌有效。结论:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌阳性菌58株(44.6%),产广谱β -内酰胺酶菌16株(20.7%)。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和广谱β -内酰胺酶的流行率增加提示应根据抗生素敏感性结果合理使用抗生素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Variations of Renal Artery in Patients Undergoing Computed Tomography of Abdomen: A Hospital-based Cross-sectional Study Knowledge, Practices and Anxiety related to Corona Virus Disease-19 (COVID -19) among Nursing Students in Nepal Clinical Nurses’ Knowledge and Attitude on Palliative Care: A Cross-Sectional Study Pregnant Women’s Mental Health Status and its Related Factors Amidst COVID-19: A Cross- Sectional Study Morphological Variation of Circle of Willis in Nepali Population: A 3D Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography Based Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1