Speculative Enterprise: Public Theaters and Financial Markets in London, 1688–1763 by Mattie Burkert (review)

IF 0.4 3区社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1353/ecs.2023.a900673

Carrie D. Shanafelt

引用次数: 0

Abstract

realize, not only from our current world, but also from the very question we are naturally prone to ask of it—the question of the origins of modern party democracy. Perhaps in scholarship as in parliamentary politics there is value to having both Tories and Whigs. Thanks to The Persistence of Party, we can at least be hopeful that future theories and grand narratives about modern party politics will be better attuned to the history of party in eighteenth-century Britain.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

投机企业:1688-1763年伦敦公共剧院与金融市场

意识到，不仅从我们当前的世界，而且从我们自然倾向于问的问题——现代政党民主的起源问题。也许在学术界，就像在议会政治中一样，拥有托利党和辉格党是有价值的。多亏了《政党的坚持》，我们至少可以希望，未来关于现代政党政治的理论和宏大叙事将更好地适应18世纪英国的政党历史。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： As the official publication of the American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies (ASECS), Eighteenth-Century Studies is committed to publishing the best of current writing on all aspects of eighteenth-century culture. The journal selects essays that employ different modes of analysis and disciplinary discourses to explore how recent historiographical, critical, and theoretical ideas have engaged scholars concerned with the eighteenth century.