A Comparative Study of Higher-Order Thinking and Teaching in the United States and United Kingdom

Q4 Social Sciences Curriculum and Teaching Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI:10.7459/ct/35.2.04
Vibhakumari Solanki, Brian R. Evans
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Higher-Order Thinking and Teaching in the United States and United Kingdom","authors":"Vibhakumari Solanki, Brian R. Evans","doi":"10.7459/ct/35.2.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United States and the United Kingdom have used standardized high-stakes testing as a measurement of students’ cognitive level to determine success in the 21st century. Standardized tests have given teachers guidance to help them determine what to teach students and how to\n teach to the test. With such increased emphasis on high-stakes standardized tests, students are being taught based on tested content. This study evaluates the frequency of higher-and lower-order items in the respective country’s standardized test, and analyzes the teaching of higher-order\n thinking within classroom instruction.","PeriodicalId":35186,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum and Teaching","volume":"35 1","pages":"45-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7459/ct/35.2.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United States and the United Kingdom have used standardized high-stakes testing as a measurement of students’ cognitive level to determine success in the 21st century. Standardized tests have given teachers guidance to help them determine what to teach students and how to teach to the test. With such increased emphasis on high-stakes standardized tests, students are being taught based on tested content. This study evaluates the frequency of higher-and lower-order items in the respective country’s standardized test, and analyzes the teaching of higher-order thinking within classroom instruction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美英高阶思维与教学的比较研究
美国和英国已经使用标准化的高风险测试来衡量学生的认知水平,以决定21世纪的成功。标准化考试为教师提供了指导,帮助他们决定教学生什么,以及如何为考试而教。随着对高风险标准化考试的日益重视,学生们正在接受基于考试内容的教学。本研究评估了各国标准化测试中高阶和低阶项目的出现频率,并分析了课堂教学中高阶思维的教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Curriculum and Teaching
Curriculum and Teaching Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Curriculum and Teaching, first published in 1985, is an established, refereed international journal publishing original research from throughout the world which deals with major up-to-date issues and trends in curriculum theory and practice. The journal uses a balanced and comparative perspective to consider curriculum design and development, evaluation, curriculum models, comparative studies in curriculum, innovation and policy, planning, and educational administration. The journal’s object is to advance the study and development of curriculum and teaching, with a view to improving teaching and pedagogy. Curriculum and Teaching provides an impartial forum for scholars throughout the world, working in the area of curriculum studies. Curriculum and Teaching is double blind peer reviewed. The journal has no publication fees.
期刊最新文献
Combined Teaching Strategies as an Attitude Changing Tool Towards Inclusive Education Quality Education in Schools Outcomes-Based Teaching and Learning Assessment Instrument for Teachers in Higher Education Curriculum Management in Higher Education: An Analysis Using the Four Frames Model Student Performance in Different Modes of Online and In-person Assessments and Impact on Academic Integrity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1