Study on Analysis of Several Molecular Identification Methods for Ciliates of Colpodea (Protista, Ciliophora)

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2022-06-28 DOI:10.1155/2022/4017442
Yumeng Song, Tingting Hao, Bailin Li, Weibin Zheng, Lihui Liu, Li Wang, Ying Chen, Xuming Pan
{"title":"Study on Analysis of Several Molecular Identification Methods for Ciliates of Colpodea (Protista, Ciliophora)","authors":"Yumeng Song, Tingting Hao, Bailin Li, Weibin Zheng, Lihui Liu, Li Wang, Ying Chen, Xuming Pan","doi":"10.1155/2022/4017442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The application of molecular techniques to accurately identify protozoan species can correct previous misidentifications based on traditional morphological identification. Colpodea ciliates have many toxicological and cytological applications, but their subtle morphological differences and small body size hinder species delineation. Herein, we used Cox I and β-tubulin genes, alongside fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), to evaluate each method in delineating Colpodea species. For this analysis, Colpoda harbinensis n. sp., C. reniformis, two populations of C. inflata, Colpoda compare grandis, and five populations of Paracolpoda steinii, from the soil in northeastern China, were used. We determined that (1) the Cox I gene was more suitable than the β-tubulin gene as a molecular marker for defining intra- and interspecific level relationships of Colpoda. (2) FISH probes designed for Colpoda sp., C. inflata, Colpoda compare grandis, and Paracolpoda steinii, provided rapid interspecific differentiation of Colpodea species. (3) Colpoda harbinensis n. sp. was established and mainly characterized by its size in vivo (approximately \n \n 80\n ×\n 60\n  \n μ\n m\n \n ), a reniform body in outline, one macronucleus, its spherical shape, a sometimes nonexistent micronucleus, 11–15 somatic kineties, and five or six postoral kineties. In conclusion, combining oligonucleotide probes, DNA barcoding, and morphology for the first time, we have greatly improved the delineation of Colpodea and confirmed that Cox I gene was a promising DNA barcoding marker for species of Colpodea, and FISH could provide useful morphological information as complementing traditional techniques such as silver carbonate.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4017442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The application of molecular techniques to accurately identify protozoan species can correct previous misidentifications based on traditional morphological identification. Colpodea ciliates have many toxicological and cytological applications, but their subtle morphological differences and small body size hinder species delineation. Herein, we used Cox I and β-tubulin genes, alongside fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), to evaluate each method in delineating Colpodea species. For this analysis, Colpoda harbinensis n. sp., C. reniformis, two populations of C. inflata, Colpoda compare grandis, and five populations of Paracolpoda steinii, from the soil in northeastern China, were used. We determined that (1) the Cox I gene was more suitable than the β-tubulin gene as a molecular marker for defining intra- and interspecific level relationships of Colpoda. (2) FISH probes designed for Colpoda sp., C. inflata, Colpoda compare grandis, and Paracolpoda steinii, provided rapid interspecific differentiation of Colpodea species. (3) Colpoda harbinensis n. sp. was established and mainly characterized by its size in vivo (approximately 80 × 60   μ m ), a reniform body in outline, one macronucleus, its spherical shape, a sometimes nonexistent micronucleus, 11–15 somatic kineties, and five or six postoral kineties. In conclusion, combining oligonucleotide probes, DNA barcoding, and morphology for the first time, we have greatly improved the delineation of Colpodea and confirmed that Cox I gene was a promising DNA barcoding marker for species of Colpodea, and FISH could provide useful morphological information as complementing traditional techniques such as silver carbonate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鞘翅目纤毛虫几种分子鉴定方法的分析研究
应用分子技术准确识别原生动物物种,可以在传统形态学识别的基础上纠正以往的错误识别。Colpodea纤毛虫具有许多毒理学和细胞学应用,但它们细微的形态差异和较小的体型阻碍了物种的划分。在本文中,我们使用Cox I和β-微管蛋白基因,以及荧光原位杂交(FISH),来评估每种方法在描述Colpodea物种方面的作用。在这项分析中,使用了来自中国东北土壤的harbinensis Colpoda n.sp.,C.reniformis,C.inflata的两个种群,Colpoda compare grandis和Paracolpoda steinii的五个种群。我们确定(1)Cox I基因比β-微管蛋白基因更适合作为确定Colpoda种内和种间关系的分子标记。(2) 为Colpoda sp.、C.inflata、Colpoda compare grandis和Paracolpoda steinii设计的FISH探针提供了Colpodea物种的快速种间分化。(3) 建立了harbinensis Colpoda n.sp.,主要通过其体内大小(约80×60  μm),外形为肾形体,一个大核,球形,有时不存在微核,11-15个体细胞动力学,5或6个口后动力学。总之,首次将寡核苷酸探针、DNA条形码和形态学相结合,我们极大地改善了Colpodea的描述,并证实Cox I基因是一种很有前途的Colpodea物种的DNA条形码标记,FISH可以提供有用的形态学信息,作为对传统技术(如碳酸银)的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1