{"title":"Improvements in tropical cyclone forecasting through ensemble prediction system at NCMRWF in India","authors":"Anumeha Dube, Raghavendra Ashrit, Sushant Kumar, Ashu Mamgain","doi":"10.1016/j.tcrr.2020.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper deals with the comparison of cyclone forecasts from the two versions of the operational global ensemble prediction system (EPS) at the National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (NEPS). The previous version had a horizontal resolution of 33 km with 44 ensemble members (NEPS) whereas the updated version of this EPS has a resolution of 12 km with 11 members (NEPS-UP). The ensemble mean forecasts from both the models are compared using the direct position (DPE), along (ATE) and cross track (CTE) errors. For the verification of strike probability, Brier Score (BS), Brier Skill Score (BSS), Reliability Diagram, Relative Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) in mean Vs Spread in members are used. For verification of intensity, RMSE in maximum wind speed from the ensemble mean forecasts are compared.</p><p>Comparison of ensemble mean tracks from both models showed lower errors in NEPS-UP for all forecast lead times. The decrease in the DPE, ATE and CTE in NEPS-UP was around 38%, 48% and 15% respectively. NEPS-UP showed lower BS and higher BSS values indicating a better match between observed frequencies and forecast probabilities as well as higher prediction skills. The reliability diagram showed higher accuracy for NEPS-UP as compared to NEPS. The ROC curves showed that for forecasts with higher probabilities the hit rate was high in NEPS-UP. There was a greater consensus between the RMSE and Spread for NEPS-UP at all lead times. It was also seen that the RMSE in mean showed a 41% decrease from NEPS to NEPS-UP. On comparing maximum wind, it was found that for all lead times the RMSE in maximum wind speed for NEPS-UP was lower than NEPS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44442,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Cyclone Research and Review","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 106-116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tcrr.2020.04.003","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Cyclone Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225603220300175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
This paper deals with the comparison of cyclone forecasts from the two versions of the operational global ensemble prediction system (EPS) at the National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (NEPS). The previous version had a horizontal resolution of 33 km with 44 ensemble members (NEPS) whereas the updated version of this EPS has a resolution of 12 km with 11 members (NEPS-UP). The ensemble mean forecasts from both the models are compared using the direct position (DPE), along (ATE) and cross track (CTE) errors. For the verification of strike probability, Brier Score (BS), Brier Skill Score (BSS), Reliability Diagram, Relative Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) in mean Vs Spread in members are used. For verification of intensity, RMSE in maximum wind speed from the ensemble mean forecasts are compared.
Comparison of ensemble mean tracks from both models showed lower errors in NEPS-UP for all forecast lead times. The decrease in the DPE, ATE and CTE in NEPS-UP was around 38%, 48% and 15% respectively. NEPS-UP showed lower BS and higher BSS values indicating a better match between observed frequencies and forecast probabilities as well as higher prediction skills. The reliability diagram showed higher accuracy for NEPS-UP as compared to NEPS. The ROC curves showed that for forecasts with higher probabilities the hit rate was high in NEPS-UP. There was a greater consensus between the RMSE and Spread for NEPS-UP at all lead times. It was also seen that the RMSE in mean showed a 41% decrease from NEPS to NEPS-UP. On comparing maximum wind, it was found that for all lead times the RMSE in maximum wind speed for NEPS-UP was lower than NEPS.
期刊介绍:
Tropical Cyclone Research and Review is an international journal focusing on tropical cyclone monitoring, forecasting, and research as well as associated hydrological effects and disaster risk reduction. This journal is edited and published by the ESCAP/WMO Typhoon Committee (TC) and the Shanghai Typhoon Institute of the China Meteorology Administration (STI/CMA). Contributions from all tropical cyclone basins are welcome.
Scope of the journal includes:
• Reviews of tropical cyclones exhibiting unusual characteristics or behavior or resulting in disastrous impacts on Typhoon Committee Members and other regional WMO bodies
• Advances in applied and basic tropical cyclone research or technology to improve tropical cyclone forecasts and warnings
• Basic theoretical studies of tropical cyclones
• Event reports, compelling images, and topic review reports of tropical cyclones
• Impacts, risk assessments, and risk management techniques related to tropical cyclones