Clinical effect of power peripherally inserted central catheter and central venous catheter in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Q4 Nursing 中华临床营养杂志 Pub Date : 2018-04-30 DOI:10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.02.009

Jing Wang, Ying Zhang, Lili Jiang, Q. Fu, Yanjie Bi, Ru-qian Zhao, H. Bai

{"title":"Clinical effect of power peripherally inserted central catheter and central venous catheter in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation","authors":"Jing Wang, Ying Zhang, Lili Jiang, Q. Fu, Yanjie Bi, Ru-qian Zhao, H. Bai","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo observed the clinical efficacy and safety of high pressure-resistant double-lumen peripherally inserted central catheter (Power PICC) and central venous catheter (CVC) in patients with stem cell transplantation. \n \n \nMethods \nThis was a matched cross-sectional study with 60 patients with leukemia who were treated with catheterization of central venous (30 cases receiving Power PICC vs. 30 cases receiving CVC) during stem cell transplantation in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital. Indwelling time, success rate of catheterization, complications, velocity and stem cell engraftment time were recorded and compared between the Power PICC group and CVC group. \n \n \nResults \nThere were significant differences between the two groups on indwelling time [(18.47±4.44)min vs. (14.43±1.72)min, t=3.719, P 0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nPower PICC performed better than CVC with well tolerability and satisfactory efficacy, which is worthy of promotion and application in the future. \n \n \nKey words: \nPeripherally inserted central catheter; Central venous catheter; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation","PeriodicalId":9877,"journal":{"name":"中华临床营养杂志","volume":"26 1","pages":"110-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华临床营养杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.02.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To observed the clinical efficacy and safety of high pressure-resistant double-lumen peripherally inserted central catheter (Power PICC) and central venous catheter (CVC) in patients with stem cell transplantation. Methods This was a matched cross-sectional study with 60 patients with leukemia who were treated with catheterization of central venous (30 cases receiving Power PICC vs. 30 cases receiving CVC) during stem cell transplantation in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital. Indwelling time, success rate of catheterization, complications, velocity and stem cell engraftment time were recorded and compared between the Power PICC group and CVC group. Results There were significant differences between the two groups on indwelling time [(18.47±4.44)min vs. (14.43±1.72)min, t=3.719, P 0.05). Conclusion Power PICC performed better than CVC with well tolerability and satisfactory efficacy, which is worthy of promotion and application in the future. Key words: Peripherally inserted central catheter; Central venous catheter; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

动力外周置置中心导管与中心静脉导管在造血干细胞移植中的临床效果

目的观察抗高压双腔周围置管中心导管(Power PICC)和中心静脉导管(CVC)在干细胞移植患者中的临床疗效和安全性。方法对中国人民解放军总医院第一附属医院造血干细胞移植行中心静脉置管治疗的60例白血病患者(Power PICC 30例，CVC 30例)进行匹配横断面研究。记录Power PICC组与CVC组的留置时间、置管成功率、并发症、速度及干细胞植入时间。结果两组患者留置时间差异有统计学意义[(18.47±4.44)min vs(14.43±1.72)min, t=3.719, P < 0.05]。结论功率PICC疗效优于CVC，耐受性好，疗效满意，值得推广应用。关键词:外周中心导尿管;中心静脉导管;造血干细胞移植

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

中华临床营养杂志 Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

2282

期刊介绍： The Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition was founded in 1993. It is the first professional academic journal (bimonthly) in my country co-sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences to disseminate information on clinical nutrition support, nutrient metabolism, the impact of nutrition support on outcomes and "cost-effectiveness", as well as translational medicine and nutrition research. It is also a professional journal of the Chinese Medical Association's Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Branch. The purpose of the Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition is to promote the rapid dissemination of knowledge on nutrient metabolism and the rational application of parenteral and enteral nutrition, focusing on the combination of multidisciplinary and multi-regional field investigations and clinical research. It mainly reports on nutritional risk screening related to the indications of parenteral and enteral nutrition support, "cost-effectiveness" research on nutritional drugs, consensus on clinical nutrition, guidelines, expert reviews, randomized controlled studies, cohort studies, glycoprotein and other nutrient metabolism research, systematic evaluation of clinical research, evidence-based case reports, special reviews, case reports and clinical experience exchanges, etc., and has a special column on new technologies related to the field of clinical nutrition and their clinical applications.