Automatic coherence analysis of Dutch: testing the subjectivity hypothesis on a larger scale

IF 0.8 Q3 LINGUISTICS Corpora Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI:10.3366/COR.2021.0211
J. Hoek, T. Sanders, W. Spooren
{"title":"Automatic coherence analysis of Dutch: testing the subjectivity hypothesis on a larger scale","authors":"J. Hoek, T. Sanders, W. Spooren","doi":"10.3366/COR.2021.0211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increasing availability of large corpora, quantitative corpus analysis is becoming more and more popular as a method for doing linguistic research. This paper uses a new research tool that makes it possible to search syntactically annotated corpora without extensive programming knowledge (CESAR) to study the subjectivity patterns of four Dutch causal connectives. Analyzing a large set of causal relations marked by four of the most frequent Dutch causal connectives (daarom, dus, omdat, and want), the case study aims to corroborate the subjectivity hypothesis established on the basis of smaller scale studies that used manual annotation. The automatic analysis of the subjectivity patterns of Dutch causal connectives illustrates the usability of CESAR in particular and the feasibility of automatic coherence analysis in general. In addition, it generates new insights into the subjectivity patterns of daarom, dus, omdat, and want.","PeriodicalId":44933,"journal":{"name":"Corpora","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corpora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/COR.2021.0211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With the increasing availability of large corpora, quantitative corpus analysis is becoming more and more popular as a method for doing linguistic research. This paper uses a new research tool that makes it possible to search syntactically annotated corpora without extensive programming knowledge (CESAR) to study the subjectivity patterns of four Dutch causal connectives. Analyzing a large set of causal relations marked by four of the most frequent Dutch causal connectives (daarom, dus, omdat, and want), the case study aims to corroborate the subjectivity hypothesis established on the basis of smaller scale studies that used manual annotation. The automatic analysis of the subjectivity patterns of Dutch causal connectives illustrates the usability of CESAR in particular and the feasibility of automatic coherence analysis in general. In addition, it generates new insights into the subjectivity patterns of daarom, dus, omdat, and want.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰语的自动连贯性分析:在更大范围内检验主体性假设
随着大量语料库的出现,定量语料库分析作为一种语言学研究方法越来越受欢迎。本文使用一种新的研究工具,即在没有广泛编程知识的情况下搜索句法注释语料库(CESAR),来研究四个荷兰因果连接词的主观性模式。案例研究分析了一大组以四种最常见的荷兰因果连接词(daarom、dus、omdat和want)为标志的因果关系,旨在证实在使用手动注释的小规模研究基础上建立的主观性假设。荷兰因果连接词主观性模式的自动分析特别说明了CESAR的可用性,以及自动连贯分析的普遍可行性。此外,它对daarom、dus、omdat和want的主体性模式产生了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Corpora
Corpora LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Introducing the Swedish Learner English Corpus: a corpus that enables investigations of the impact of extramural activities on L2 writing Exploring part of speech (pos) tag sequences in a large-scale learner corpus of L2 English: a developmental perspective Review: Barth and Schnell. 2022. Understanding Corpus Linguistics. New York: Routledge The Video Game Dialogue Corpus Developing a multimodal corpus of L2 academic English from an English medium of instruction university in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1