Analysis of the Pentecostal Theological Methods from Amos Yong’s Trialectic based on John Frame’s Triperspectivalism

A. Antonius
{"title":"Analysis of the Pentecostal Theological Methods from Amos Yong’s Trialectic based on John Frame’s Triperspectivalism","authors":"A. Antonius","doi":"10.36421/veritas.v21i2.510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pentecostalism is one of the fast-growing traditions that is distinctive in its theological method. Some Pentecostals also claim that they are an evangelical church. This claim can lead to debates and blur the meaning of evangelical as if there is no difference between the two. This difference cannot be seen only from the church’s status but from the method of theology that underlies it. Therefore, this study will compare the theological method of the Pentecostals-Charismatics, represented by Amos Yong, and the theological method of the Reformed, represented by John M. Frame. The purpose of this comparison is to try to find common ground and balance between the two approaches. Frame’s Triperspectivalism method can give room for Yong’s Tria­lectic method to see the Holy Spirit-Word-Community aspect from the normative, situational, and existential lenses of theology as three inseparable parts. Thus, it is hoped that there can be harmony in theological methods between the Pentecostal-Charismatic tradition and the Reformed tradition.","PeriodicalId":33647,"journal":{"name":"Veritas Jurnal Teologi dan Pelayanan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veritas Jurnal Teologi dan Pelayanan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36421/veritas.v21i2.510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pentecostalism is one of the fast-growing traditions that is distinctive in its theological method. Some Pentecostals also claim that they are an evangelical church. This claim can lead to debates and blur the meaning of evangelical as if there is no difference between the two. This difference cannot be seen only from the church’s status but from the method of theology that underlies it. Therefore, this study will compare the theological method of the Pentecostals-Charismatics, represented by Amos Yong, and the theological method of the Reformed, represented by John M. Frame. The purpose of this comparison is to try to find common ground and balance between the two approaches. Frame’s Triperspectivalism method can give room for Yong’s Tria­lectic method to see the Holy Spirit-Word-Community aspect from the normative, situational, and existential lenses of theology as three inseparable parts. Thus, it is hoped that there can be harmony in theological methods between the Pentecostal-Charismatic tradition and the Reformed tradition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从约翰·弗雷姆的三透视论看阿莫斯·杨的《试炼》中的五旬节派神学方法
五旬节派是快速发展的传统之一,其神学方法与众不同。一些五旬节派也声称他们是一个福音派教会。这种说法可能会导致争论,并模糊了福音派的含义,好像两者之间没有区别。这种差异不能只从教会的地位,但从方法的神学,它的基础。因此,本研究将比较以阿摩司·杨为代表的五旬节派-灵恩派神学方法与以约翰·弗雷姆为代表的改革宗神学方法。这种比较的目的是试图在这两种方法之间找到共同点和平衡。框架的三透视法可以为杨的三电法提供空间,从神学的规范、情境和存在三个不可分割的部分来看待圣灵-话语-团体方面。因此,我们希望五旬节派灵恩派传统和改革宗传统在神学方法上能够和谐一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
PERAN PUSAT PENGEMBANGAN ANAK IO-497 BENYAMIN OEBUFU DALAM PEMULIHAN SPIRITUALITAS PASCA SIKLON SEROJA DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF ETIKA SOLIDARITAS PERIKANAN DANAU GALILEA ABAD PERTAMA UNTUK MEMAHAMI KAPERNAUM SEBAGAI KOTA YESUS (MATIUS 9:1) MEMBEDAH KONTEKSTUALISASI DOKUMEN PERSONA HUMANA 1975 DALAM TERANG MODEL TERJEMAHAN STEPHEN BEVANS INTFAITH MARRIAGE IN INDONESIA: LOOKING FOR A LOOPHOLE PENDEKATAN INTERKULTURAL SEBAGAI MODEL MISIONAL: SEBUAH UPAYA UNTUK MEREKONSTRUKSI KEMBALI MISI DI ABAD XXI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1