A few remarks on the (im)perfection of the term securities: a theoretical study

Peráček Tomáš
{"title":"A few remarks on the (im)perfection of the term securities: a theoretical study","authors":"Peráček Tomáš","doi":"10.24818/tbj/2021/11/2.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This theoretical study is primarily anchored in the area of economic theory, legal theory and law. It seeks a multidisciplinary and comparative examination of issues, the concept and regulation of which remains largely unfinished in the international economic, legal environment and in the decades of professional and laconic debates. Not only in economic terms, there are numbers of unanswered questions in the long term, not only in economic practice. However, as the concept of a security is a matter of non-economic interest as well as legal theorists, the answers to the lack of clarity and difficulties are quite difficult to find. The aim of the study is to contribute to the correct economic and theoretical definition of a key concept in the field of securities. The setting of this objective is based directly on needs and emerging practical problems in business practice. Indeed, their proper understanding and application has a fundamental impact on the contractual trading of securities in global terms. In connection with the processing of the matter, we have applied primarily qualitative methods, having regard to the nature of the subject of the matter under examination (methodological and economic terms). However, we also make use of scientific literature, case-law and the analogy of law, providing our contribution with qualifying responses to the pitfalls of economic and legal practices.","PeriodicalId":41903,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/tbj/2021/11/2.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This theoretical study is primarily anchored in the area of economic theory, legal theory and law. It seeks a multidisciplinary and comparative examination of issues, the concept and regulation of which remains largely unfinished in the international economic, legal environment and in the decades of professional and laconic debates. Not only in economic terms, there are numbers of unanswered questions in the long term, not only in economic practice. However, as the concept of a security is a matter of non-economic interest as well as legal theorists, the answers to the lack of clarity and difficulties are quite difficult to find. The aim of the study is to contribute to the correct economic and theoretical definition of a key concept in the field of securities. The setting of this objective is based directly on needs and emerging practical problems in business practice. Indeed, their proper understanding and application has a fundamental impact on the contractual trading of securities in global terms. In connection with the processing of the matter, we have applied primarily qualitative methods, having regard to the nature of the subject of the matter under examination (methodological and economic terms). However, we also make use of scientific literature, case-law and the analogy of law, providing our contribution with qualifying responses to the pitfalls of economic and legal practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
证券术语完善的几点理论思考
这一理论研究主要集中在经济理论、法律理论和法律领域。它寻求对各种问题进行多学科和比较性的审查,在国际经济、法律环境以及几十年的专业和简洁辩论中,这些问题的概念和管理基本上仍未完成。不仅在经济方面,从长远来看,还有许多问题没有得到解答,而不仅仅是在经济实践中。然而,由于担保的概念与法律理论家一样是一个非经济利益问题,因此很难找到缺乏明确性和困难的答案。本研究的目的是为证券领域一个关键概念的正确经济和理论定义做出贡献。这一目标的设定直接基于业务实践中的需求和新出现的实际问题。事实上,它们的正确理解和应用对全球证券合约交易产生了根本影响。在处理该事项方面,我们主要采用定性方法,同时考虑到所审查事项的性质(方法和经济术语)。然而,我们也利用了科学文献、判例法和法律类比,为我们的贡献提供了对经济和法律实践陷阱的合格回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Compensation for non-material damage caused to legal entities in the decision-making practice of the CJEU and the ECHR Problems of legal regulation of artificial intelligence in administrative judicial procedure Preventing computer crime by knowing the legal regulations that ensure the protection of computer systems A regulatory analysis of digital financial services and the adoption of central bank digital currencies in Zimbabwe and South Africa Forum shopping in regulatory sandboxes and the perils of experimental law-making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1