EXPLOITATION OF PAYDAY LOAN USERS: FACT OR FICTION?

Silvia Szilagyiova
{"title":"EXPLOITATION OF PAYDAY LOAN USERS: FACT OR FICTION?","authors":"Silvia Szilagyiova","doi":"10.20472/es.2019.8.2.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the existence of different forms and underpinning reasons of exploitation at households level. The empirical analysis, based on data from the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) collected for the purpose of understanding the social and economic change in Britain, aims to identify underpinning factors of mixed conclusions from empirical evidence on the existence of exploitation of payday loan users. This paper goes beyond traditional economic explanation and focuses on factors defining conditional relative advantage exploitation leading to voluntary exploitation. The results suggest that due to an ?act in desperation?, current regulations on payday loan lending are powerless and cannot prevent households being voluntary exploited. In addition, results show that increased household financial burden and additional borrowing increase the likelihood of households to take a gamble in order to provide basic needs. The results provide more insight into why current policy regulations fail to tackle the problem of payday loan lending.","PeriodicalId":42415,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Economic Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Economic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20472/es.2019.8.2.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper explores the existence of different forms and underpinning reasons of exploitation at households level. The empirical analysis, based on data from the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) collected for the purpose of understanding the social and economic change in Britain, aims to identify underpinning factors of mixed conclusions from empirical evidence on the existence of exploitation of payday loan users. This paper goes beyond traditional economic explanation and focuses on factors defining conditional relative advantage exploitation leading to voluntary exploitation. The results suggest that due to an ?act in desperation?, current regulations on payday loan lending are powerless and cannot prevent households being voluntary exploited. In addition, results show that increased household financial burden and additional borrowing increase the likelihood of households to take a gamble in order to provide basic needs. The results provide more insight into why current policy regulations fail to tackle the problem of payday loan lending.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发薪日贷款用户的剥削:事实还是虚构?
本文探讨了家庭层面剥削的不同形式及其根本原因。实证分析基于英国家庭小组调查(BHPS)的数据,旨在了解英国的社会和经济变化,旨在从关于发薪日贷款用户存在剥削的实证证据中找出混合结论的基础因素。本文超越了传统的经济学解释,重点研究了条件相对优势剥削导致自愿剥削的因素。结果表明,由于?在绝望中行动?,目前对发薪日贷款的规定是无力的,也无法阻止家庭被自愿剥削。此外,研究结果表明,家庭经济负担的增加和额外的借贷增加了家庭为了满足基本需求而赌博的可能性。研究结果为当前政策法规未能解决发薪日贷款问题提供了更多见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Error in the Theory of Seigniorage Nexus Between Foreign Direct Investment and Employment in Manufacturing and Services Sectors in Tunisia: An ARDL Approach Is the Eurozone an Optimum Currency Area? Public funding in R&D and R&D outcome sustainable development: Analysis of Member States EU The Treynor Ratio as a Risk-adjusted Return of Croatian Listed Firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1