An empirically based just linear income tax system

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q3 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Mathematical Sociology Pub Date : 2021-01-04 DOI:10.1080/0022250X.2020.1859501
G. Jasso, B. Wegener
{"title":"An empirically based just linear income tax system","authors":"G. Jasso, B. Wegener","doi":"10.1080/0022250X.2020.1859501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper develops and illustrates a method for empirically designing an income tax system that people will regard as fair. The paper begins with the classical Principles of Tax Justice, viz., as pretax income increases, three quantities should also increase – posttax income, tax amount, and tax rate. GSOEP data on residents’ pretax income and the posttax income they regard as fair are used to estimate a just linear income tax system. Analytic results include a signature standard form of the tax system showing the intertwined fates of poor and rich and the conditions which threaten fairness. Empirical results show that the estimated tax system lowers taxes for a majority of respondents, especially the relatively poorer, and substantially reduces inequality.","PeriodicalId":50139,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Sociology","volume":"46 1","pages":"195 - 225"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0022250X.2020.1859501","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematical Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2020.1859501","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper develops and illustrates a method for empirically designing an income tax system that people will regard as fair. The paper begins with the classical Principles of Tax Justice, viz., as pretax income increases, three quantities should also increase – posttax income, tax amount, and tax rate. GSOEP data on residents’ pretax income and the posttax income they regard as fair are used to estimate a just linear income tax system. Analytic results include a signature standard form of the tax system showing the intertwined fates of poor and rich and the conditions which threaten fairness. Empirical results show that the estimated tax system lowers taxes for a majority of respondents, especially the relatively poorer, and substantially reduces inequality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于经验的线性所得税制度
摘要本文发展并说明了一种经验设计人们会认为公平的所得税制度的方法。本文从经典的税收正义原则出发,即随着税前收入的增加,税后收入、税额和税率三个量也应该增加。GSOEP关于居民税前收入和税后收入的数据被认为是公平的,用来估计一个公正的线性所得税制度。分析结果包括一个标志性的税收制度标准形式,显示了穷人和富人的命运交织在一起,以及威胁公平的条件。实证结果表明,估计的税收制度降低了大多数受访者的税收,特别是相对较穷的人,并大大减少了不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mathematical Sociology
Journal of Mathematical Sociology 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of the Journal of Mathematical Sociology is to publish models and mathematical techniques that would likely be useful to professional sociologists. The Journal also welcomes papers of mutual interest to social scientists and other social and behavioral scientists, as well as papers by non-social scientists that may encourage fruitful connections between sociology and other disciplines. Reviews of new or developing areas of mathematics and mathematical modeling that may have significant applications in sociology will also be considered. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology is published in association with the International Network for Social Network Analysis, the Japanese Association for Mathematical Sociology, the Mathematical Sociology Section of the American Sociological Association, and the Methodology Section of the American Sociological Association.
期刊最新文献
What Amphibians Can Teach Us About the Evolution of Parental Care. Can altruism lead to a willingness to take risks? Everybody herds, sometimes: cumulative advantage as a product of rational learning Hurdle-QAP models overcome dependency and sparsity in scientific collaboration count networks Latent class analysis of multigroup heterogeneity in propensity for academic dishonesty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1