{"title":"Communal Intellection and Individualism in the African Novel","authors":"A. Harris","doi":"10.1017/pli.2021.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advancement of individual integrity as an alternative to the dissolution that concludes so many African novels is a compelling (and, in Jackson’s sophisticated analysis, convincing) idea. But I am nevertheless left wondering why so many African novels of ideas do end in states of dissociation and disassociation “in which intellection signals not just social illegibility but literal death”?2 I wager that if we approach novelistic form as deeply entangled in aesthetic, cultural, contextual, historical, and philosophical codes, we can trace a historical arch of the genre’s formal limitations for intellection in African contexts that explains this tendency. To illustrate this claim, I wish briefly to discuss S. E. K. Mqhayi’s Ityala lamawele (Lawsuit of the Twins), first published in 1914 with the missionary Lovedale Press and widely considered to be the first isiXhosa novel. To call Ityala lamawele a novel is to stretch the description of that genre a little far. The original 1914 text comprised a mere nine chapters and was no longer","PeriodicalId":42913,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry","volume":"9 1","pages":"256 - 262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pli.2021.48","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The advancement of individual integrity as an alternative to the dissolution that concludes so many African novels is a compelling (and, in Jackson’s sophisticated analysis, convincing) idea. But I am nevertheless left wondering why so many African novels of ideas do end in states of dissociation and disassociation “in which intellection signals not just social illegibility but literal death”?2 I wager that if we approach novelistic form as deeply entangled in aesthetic, cultural, contextual, historical, and philosophical codes, we can trace a historical arch of the genre’s formal limitations for intellection in African contexts that explains this tendency. To illustrate this claim, I wish briefly to discuss S. E. K. Mqhayi’s Ityala lamawele (Lawsuit of the Twins), first published in 1914 with the missionary Lovedale Press and widely considered to be the first isiXhosa novel. To call Ityala lamawele a novel is to stretch the description of that genre a little far. The original 1914 text comprised a mere nine chapters and was no longer
个人完整的进步作为一种替代解体的选择,终结了如此多的非洲小说,这是一个令人信服的想法(在杰克逊的复杂分析中,令人信服)。但我仍然想知道,为什么这么多关于思想的非洲小说最终都以分离和分离的状态结束“在这种状态下,思想不仅标志着社会的难以辨认,而且标志着字面上的死亡”?我敢打赌,如果我们把小说形式深深纠缠在美学、文化、语境、历史和哲学规范中,我们就能追溯出这一类型在非洲语境中对思想的形式限制的历史脉络,从而解释这种趋势。为了说明这一说法,我希望简要地讨论一下S. E. K. Mqhayi的《孪生兄弟的诉讼》(Ityala lamawele),该书于1914年由传教士洛夫代尔出版社首次出版,被广泛认为是第一部isikhosa小说。把《亚塔拉·拉玛威尔》称为小说,未免把这种类型的描述延伸得太远了。1914年的原版只有九章,现在已经不存在了