Dongshi as reflexive habitus to understand Chinese rural students’ academic success

IF 1.8 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Cambridge Journal of Education Pub Date : 2021-09-17 DOI:10.1080/0305764X.2021.1973375
Yanrui Xu
{"title":"Dongshi as reflexive habitus to understand Chinese rural students’ academic success","authors":"Yanrui Xu","doi":"10.1080/0305764X.2021.1973375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article uses a Chinese notion, dongshi, to understand Chinese rural students’ academic success in terms of accessing elite universities. Dongshi is defined as reflexive habitus informed by Bourdieu’s notions of field, capital and habitus. Through a qualitative study of a group of rural students’ pre-university life stories, dongshi emerges from the data, which alludes to four facets of reflexivity: (1) empathetic understanding of their parents’ hardships in supporting their education; (2) their parents’ powerlessness in educational involvement; (3) the significance of knowledge in changing destinies; and (4) expectations of repaying their parents. As reflexive habitus, dongshi echoes the transformative aspect of habitus, contributing to rural students’ access to elite universities. This article contributes to the constructive dialogue with Bourdieu in Chinese sociology of education and calls for global researchers to reflect on the theoretical resources available in their linguistic repertoire when contextualising Bourdieu.","PeriodicalId":47730,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Education","volume":"52 1","pages":"255 - 270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1973375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article uses a Chinese notion, dongshi, to understand Chinese rural students’ academic success in terms of accessing elite universities. Dongshi is defined as reflexive habitus informed by Bourdieu’s notions of field, capital and habitus. Through a qualitative study of a group of rural students’ pre-university life stories, dongshi emerges from the data, which alludes to four facets of reflexivity: (1) empathetic understanding of their parents’ hardships in supporting their education; (2) their parents’ powerlessness in educational involvement; (3) the significance of knowledge in changing destinies; and (4) expectations of repaying their parents. As reflexive habitus, dongshi echoes the transformative aspect of habitus, contributing to rural students’ access to elite universities. This article contributes to the constructive dialogue with Bourdieu in Chinese sociology of education and calls for global researchers to reflect on the theoretical resources available in their linguistic repertoire when contextualising Bourdieu.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
东施作为反思性惯习理解中国农村学生的学业成功
摘要本文运用中国的“学”概念,从进入名校的角度来理解中国农村学生的学业成功。东适被定义为受布迪厄场域、资本和习性概念影响的反身性惯习。通过对一组农村学生大学前生活故事的定性研究,“东时”从数据中浮现出来,暗示了四个方面的反身性:(1)对父母资助其教育的艰辛的共情理解;(2)家长参与教育的无力感;(3)知识在改变命运中的意义;(4)报答父母的期望。作为一种反身性习惯,东时反映了习惯的变革方面,有助于农村学生进入精英大学。本文有助于与布迪厄在中国教育社会学中的建设性对话,并呼吁全球研究人员在对布迪厄进行语境化时,反思其语言库中可用的理论资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cambridge Journal of Education
Cambridge Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Cambridge Journal of Education publishes original refereed articles on all aspects of education, with a particular emphasis on work that contributes to a shared understanding amongst academic researchers, theorists, practising teachers, policy-makers and educational administrators. The journal also welcomes the submission of systematic review articles that summarise and offer new insights into specific areas of educational concern. With a wide international readership, Cambridge Journal of Education publishes contributions drawn from different educational systems and cultures enabling continued in-depth discussion of global educational theory, policy and practice. The journal’s Special Issue programme encourages and stimulates focused discussion and engagement with significant themes and responses to topics raised by readers and contributors. Cambridge Journal of Education welcomes proposals for future editions.
期刊最新文献
Academisation, neoliberal technologies of governance and the rapid growth of multi-academy trusts (MATs) in England “Sometimes it feels like we are puppets, here to listen to but not speak”: listening to the voices of young Bangladeshi students about barriers to well-being at school Funds of courage: advancing social justice in children’s reading for pleasure Indigenous youth wellbeing in higher education: a systematic literature review of qualitative studies Adolescents’ and teachers’ experience of shared education: a small-scale qualitative study in Northern Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1