The Role of the Communication Discipline to Tackle COVID-19: Interrogating Positive Deviations and Critical Discourses
A. Singhal, Do Kyun David Kim
下载PDF
{"title":"The Role of the Communication Discipline to Tackle COVID-19: Interrogating Positive Deviations and Critical Discourses","authors":"A. Singhal, Do Kyun David Kim","doi":"10.1177/09732586211002930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic descended on us in an unexpected, uncontrollable, and unpredictable manner, disrupting the world order and affecting all sectors of human society. The world had little time to prepare for the ravages of a novel and highly infectious coronavirus. By February 2021, some 112 million people had contracted COVID-19 globally, and 2.5 million had died. Even with the availability of vaccines at warp speed, and vaccination efforts rolling out in early 2021, it is still uncertain how the pandemic—with all its highly infectious mutant variants—would play out. No one knows with any certainty what the endpoint will be, and what lies ahead. Since the spread of the COVID-19 was uncontrollable from the beginning, and little was known about the novel virus, the pandemic response has varied greatly at the global, national, and regional levels. Remarkably, several scientifically advanced countries had dismal pandemic responses, notably the USA and the UK. The U.S. arguably had the worst response, accounting for 25% (28 million) of the global COVID-19 cases, and 20% (500,000) of the deaths. In contrast, several developing countries of Asia and Africa have done a remarkable job of controlling COVID-19 with scant resources. For instance, to date, Bhutan has recorded only one death among its population, and Vietnam, Rwanda, and Senegal have, respectively, recorded 35, 226, and 700 deaths (Drexler, 2021). While the reasons for pandemic success vary from country-to-country, the key reasons for success centre around various communicative functions—the exercise of political will through the setting of media and public agendas (Dearing & Rogers, 1996), attentive and compassionate leadership with safety nets for the most vulnerable (Singhal & Rogers, 2003), clear cut publichealth guidance (Kim et al., 2014), early and relentless contact-tracing of people’s social networks, and a shared understanding of the value of preventive practices such as quarantining, social distancing, masking, and hand hygiene (Kim, 2020; Kim & Kreps, 2020). Unlike the disastrous leadership of Donald Trump in the USA, in Bhutan, King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck set the policy, media, and public agenda for COVID-19 right off the bat by telling government officials that even one death was too many, that detailed plans be made, Journal of Creative Communications 16(2) 135–138, 2021 © 2021 MICA-The School of Ideas Reprints and permissions: in.sagepub.com/journals-permissions-india DOI: 10.1177/09732586211002930 journals.sagepub.com/home/crc","PeriodicalId":43888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creative Communications","volume":"16 1","pages":"135 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/09732586211002930","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creative Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09732586211002930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
引用
批量引用
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic descended on us in an unexpected, uncontrollable, and unpredictable manner, disrupting the world order and affecting all sectors of human society. The world had little time to prepare for the ravages of a novel and highly infectious coronavirus. By February 2021, some 112 million people had contracted COVID-19 globally, and 2.5 million had died. Even with the availability of vaccines at warp speed, and vaccination efforts rolling out in early 2021, it is still uncertain how the pandemic—with all its highly infectious mutant variants—would play out. No one knows with any certainty what the endpoint will be, and what lies ahead. Since the spread of the COVID-19 was uncontrollable from the beginning, and little was known about the novel virus, the pandemic response has varied greatly at the global, national, and regional levels. Remarkably, several scientifically advanced countries had dismal pandemic responses, notably the USA and the UK. The U.S. arguably had the worst response, accounting for 25% (28 million) of the global COVID-19 cases, and 20% (500,000) of the deaths. In contrast, several developing countries of Asia and Africa have done a remarkable job of controlling COVID-19 with scant resources. For instance, to date, Bhutan has recorded only one death among its population, and Vietnam, Rwanda, and Senegal have, respectively, recorded 35, 226, and 700 deaths (Drexler, 2021). While the reasons for pandemic success vary from country-to-country, the key reasons for success centre around various communicative functions—the exercise of political will through the setting of media and public agendas (Dearing & Rogers, 1996), attentive and compassionate leadership with safety nets for the most vulnerable (Singhal & Rogers, 2003), clear cut publichealth guidance (Kim et al., 2014), early and relentless contact-tracing of people’s social networks, and a shared understanding of the value of preventive practices such as quarantining, social distancing, masking, and hand hygiene (Kim, 2020; Kim & Kreps, 2020). Unlike the disastrous leadership of Donald Trump in the USA, in Bhutan, King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck set the policy, media, and public agenda for COVID-19 right off the bat by telling government officials that even one death was too many, that detailed plans be made, Journal of Creative Communications 16(2) 135–138, 2021 © 2021 MICA-The School of Ideas Reprints and permissions: in.sagepub.com/journals-permissions-india DOI: 10.1177/09732586211002930 journals.sagepub.com/home/crc
传播学科在应对COVID-19中的作用:质疑积极偏差和批判性话语
新冠肺炎疫情以不可预料、不可控制、不可预测的方式向我们袭来,扰乱了世界秩序,影响了人类社会的各个领域。世界几乎没有时间为一种新型高传染性冠状病毒的肆虐做好准备。截至2021年2月,全球约有1.12亿人感染COVID-19, 250万人死亡。即使疫苗以极快的速度可用,疫苗接种工作也将在2021年初推出,但目前仍不确定这种具有高度传染性的突变变体的大流行将如何发展。没有人确切地知道终点会是什么,前方会是什么。由于COVID-19的传播从一开始就无法控制,并且对这种新型病毒知之甚少,因此在全球,国家和地区层面的大流行应对措施存在很大差异。值得注意的是,几个科学发达的国家对疫情的反应令人沮丧,尤其是美国和英国。美国可以说是应对最糟糕的,占全球新冠肺炎病例的25%(2800万),占死亡人数的20%(50万)。相比之下,亚洲和非洲的一些发展中国家在资源匮乏的情况下,在控制COVID-19方面取得了令人瞩目的成就。例如,迄今为止,不丹仅记录了一人死亡,而越南、卢旺达和塞内加尔分别记录了35人、226人和700人死亡(德雷克斯勒,2021年)。虽然大流行成功的原因因国而不同,但成功的关键原因围绕着各种沟通功能-通过设置媒体和公共议程行使政治意愿(迪林和罗杰斯,1996年),为最弱势群体提供安全网的细心和富有同情心的领导(Singhal和罗杰斯,2003年),明确的公共卫生指导(Kim等人,2014年),早期和不懈地追踪人们的社交网络接触者,以及对隔离、社交距离、口罩和手部卫生等预防措施价值的共同理解(Kim, 2020年;Kim & Kreps, 2020)。与美国唐纳德·特朗普的灾难性领导不同,在不丹,国王吉格梅·凯萨尔·纳姆吉尔·旺楚克告诉政府官员,即使一个人死亡也太多了,也要制定详细的计划,立即制定了应对COVID-19的政策、媒体和公共议程,《创意传播杂志》16(2)135-138,2021©2021 MICA-The School of Ideas转载和许可:in.sagepub.com/journals-permissions-india DOI: 10.1177/09732586211002930 journals.sagepub.com/home/crc
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。