Political Reasons and the Limits of Political Authority

IF 1.2 Q1 LAW Legal Theory Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1017/S1352325223000022
Arie Rosen
{"title":"Political Reasons and the Limits of Political Authority","authors":"Arie Rosen","doi":"10.1017/S1352325223000022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Authority is a normative power to create duties in others. The most plausible accounts of this general power relate it to existing reasons the subjects of authority have with which authoritative directives can help them comply. Such accounts lead some theorists to ascribe a morally ambitious function to political institutions. This article argues against such theories. It defends political authority as a modest normative power, constrained by the type of reasons with which it can help its subjects comply. This modest account differs from other liberal views in the limits it imposes on the exercise of political authority. It casts doubt on familiar limits that protect an individual private sphere. Instead, it imposes a condition of moderation. It suggests that legitimate exercises of political authority should leave space for individuals to be motivated by reasons that political institutions do not and should not mediate for them.","PeriodicalId":44287,"journal":{"name":"Legal Theory","volume":"29 1","pages":"63 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325223000022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Authority is a normative power to create duties in others. The most plausible accounts of this general power relate it to existing reasons the subjects of authority have with which authoritative directives can help them comply. Such accounts lead some theorists to ascribe a morally ambitious function to political institutions. This article argues against such theories. It defends political authority as a modest normative power, constrained by the type of reasons with which it can help its subjects comply. This modest account differs from other liberal views in the limits it imposes on the exercise of political authority. It casts doubt on familiar limits that protect an individual private sphere. Instead, it imposes a condition of moderation. It suggests that legitimate exercises of political authority should leave space for individuals to be motivated by reasons that political institutions do not and should not mediate for them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治原因与政治权威的局限
权威是一种赋予他人义务的规范性权力。对这种普遍权力最合理的解释是,它与权威主体的现有理由有关,权威指令可以帮助他们遵守这些理由。这样的描述导致一些理论家将道德野心的功能归于政治制度。这篇文章反对这样的理论。它将政治权威作为一种适度的规范性权力进行辩护,这种权力受到其能够帮助其臣民服从的理由类型的限制。这种适度的解释与其他自由主义观点的不同之处在于,它对政治权威的行使施加了限制。它让人们对保护个人隐私领域的常见限制产生了怀疑。相反,它强加了一个适度的条件。它表明,政治权威的合法行使应该给个人留下空间,让他们受到政治机构没有也不应该为他们调解的理由的激励。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Administration as Democratic Trustee Representation Proportionality, Comparability, and Parity: A Discussion on the Rationality of Balancing Neglecting Others and Making It Up to Them: The Idea of a Corrective Duty The Promise and Limits of Grounding in Law The Exclusionary Power of Political Directives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1