The Rhetorical Education of William Jennings Bryan: Isocrates, Character, and Imitation

Q1 Arts and Humanities Advances in the History of Rhetoric Pub Date : 2017-09-01 DOI:10.1080/15362426.2017.1371654
C. Oldenburg, Adam E. Enz
{"title":"The Rhetorical Education of William Jennings Bryan: Isocrates, Character, and Imitation","authors":"C. Oldenburg, Adam E. Enz","doi":"10.1080/15362426.2017.1371654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the late American nineteenth century, oratory was de rigueur. Institutionally, liberal arts colleges sought to distinguish themselves by teaching moral character. Such an ethotic education was sine qua non for any student of political oratory. This essay argues that such an emphasis on character and oratory, coupled with Illinois College’s rhetorical curriculum and extracurricular events, afforded a kairotic and didactic moment for William Jennings Bryan to learn and practice Isocrates’ brand of rhetorical paideia. Taught primarily through the use of paradigm cases and imitation, Isocrates emphasized the import of a speaker’s ethos over the art itself. Bryan shared this perspective. Drawing from both “Against the Sophists” and “Antidosis,” we conduct a comparative analysis by reading Isocrates’ ethotic-based rhetorical theory alongside of Bryan’s 1881 graduating oration entitled “Character.”","PeriodicalId":38049,"journal":{"name":"Advances in the History of Rhetoric","volume":"20 1","pages":"302 - 319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15362426.2017.1371654","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in the History of Rhetoric","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15362426.2017.1371654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the late American nineteenth century, oratory was de rigueur. Institutionally, liberal arts colleges sought to distinguish themselves by teaching moral character. Such an ethotic education was sine qua non for any student of political oratory. This essay argues that such an emphasis on character and oratory, coupled with Illinois College’s rhetorical curriculum and extracurricular events, afforded a kairotic and didactic moment for William Jennings Bryan to learn and practice Isocrates’ brand of rhetorical paideia. Taught primarily through the use of paradigm cases and imitation, Isocrates emphasized the import of a speaker’s ethos over the art itself. Bryan shared this perspective. Drawing from both “Against the Sophists” and “Antidosis,” we conduct a comparative analysis by reading Isocrates’ ethotic-based rhetorical theory alongside of Bryan’s 1881 graduating oration entitled “Character.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
威廉·詹宁斯·布莱恩的修辞教育:等值、品格与模仿
在19世纪晚期的美国,演讲是一种礼节。从制度上讲,文理学院试图通过教授道德品质来区分自己。这样的道德教育对任何学习政治演讲的学生来说都是必不可少的。这篇文章认为,这种对性格和演讲的强调,加上伊利诺伊大学的修辞课程和课外活动,为威廉·詹宁斯·布莱恩学习和实践伊索克拉特的修辞风格提供了一个生动和说教的时刻。教学主要通过使用范例案例和模仿,伊索克拉特强调了一个演讲者的精神的艺术本身的重要性。布莱恩分享了这个观点。从《反对诡辩家》和《解毒剂》中,我们通过阅读伊索克拉底基于伦理学的修辞学理论和布莱恩1881年题为《性格》的毕业演讲来进行比较分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in the History of Rhetoric
Advances in the History of Rhetoric Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
“Anarchy in the USA”: Win McNamee’s Capitol Riot Photographs and the Rhetoric of Desecration Museums in Motu in the Anthropocene: From Active Space to Spatial Actions Feminist Movements: The Role of Coalition, Travel, and Labor in the Third World Women’s Alliance The Moves of Civil Rights: Examining the 1957 Prayer Pilgrimage for Freedom Phantom Mobility: Coercion, Conversion, and Letter Writing in Colonial Sri Lanka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1